Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [144r] (291/380)
The record is made up of 1 file (187 folios). It was created in 1 Jul 1916-7 Dec 1918. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
surely be only one answer to such a question. Mesopotamia is on a different footing
from Syria or Palestine. We owe nothing there to outside assistance, Arab or
European. We fought the whole campaign unaided, and have administered the
occupied territories on oar own lines, without external help. That the work has been
well done, and solid foundations laid of'a new political system, is generally admitted.
It can be to nobody’s interest, least of all to that of the local inhabitants, that we
should leave our task unfinished. As the head of the American Relief Mission to
Persia recently remarked to the Civil Commissioner at Baghdad : “ You British must
stay here to carry on this great work in the interests of the world.”
0. Moreover, we have a strategic interest in Mesopotamia. The story of
German penetration in the direction of the Persian Gulf—the celebrated “ Berlin-
Baghdad ” project—is well known. It was recognised even before the war as a
direct menace to our position in India. By good fortune the enemy designs were
still incomplete when the war broke out. We were able, within a very few weeks of
Turkey’s intervention, to occupy Basra ; and, by the time that Turkey sued for an
armistice, had pushed our front northwards beyond Baghdad to the very gates of Mosul.
It is essential to the safety of India that our rivals should in no circumstances and
under no conditions whatsoever be permitted to resume their operations after the war.
A barrier must be set up in Mesopotamia, whatever its precise form, that will
effectually close the land line to the head of the Gulf against any potential enemy of
the British Empire.
10. If this object is to be achieved, it may be regarded as axiomatic (1) that no
part of Mesopotamia should be restored to the Turks; and (2) that at any rate the
portion of the conquered territories lying nearest the Gulf (i.e., the Basra Vilayet)
should remain under effective British control. Annexation having been, ruled out,
even as regards the Basra Vilayet, the most favourable alternative appears to be the
establishment of an Arab State under British control. This being so, we should at
least aim at securing that the control is real and exclusive, and leaves uo opening for
the machinations of foreign Powers. So far as Basra is concerned, this is vital. We
need be under no illusions as to the ability of an Arab administration, if left to itself,
to resist foreign intrigue or to bar the way to foreign encroachment. It is not
enough to expel the Turk. We cannot afford to leave a vacuum for others to fill. It
is essential that we should control, and effectively control, the external relations of
the Arab State. If there is to be a fair diplomatic field and no favour, we run the
risk that German diplomacy (supposing Germany to regain anything like her old
strength and ambitions) will beat us with the Arabs, just as it beat us with the Turks.
In that event, the results of our vast military efforts during the last four years might
conceivably be neutralised. We might even (to put an extreme case) live to see
another Baghdad railway contract granted by an Arab Government ; or, if we relax
our control over Basra and the surrounding district, we may start the next war with
the mouth of the Shat-el-Arab fortified by German engineers as strongly as the mouth
of the Thames, and with German submarine bases all along the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
. The
risk is one that we cannot afford to take.
11. This is of course an extreme case. What may more probably be expected
to happen, if a vacuum is left, is this. The Germans will be driven to seek raw
material wherever they can find it, and not only to obtain it for themselves, but to
make it difficult for us to obtain it. A peaceful commercial penetration of Mesopo
tamia is therefore indicated. But commercial penetration means political penetration,
and political penetration—if the object is to make difficulties for us—means the
creation and encouragement of* every kind of anti-British feeling (and experience has
shown that in such circumstances the Germans do not shrink from playing on
anti-Christian feeling) in a particularly sensitive region. We should find ourselves
engaged in constant small feuds in Arabia, Mesopotamia, and on the coast of the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
; German warships would appear in those waters : the impotent and
incapable Persia would be drawn in ; Pauislamism would lift up its head again—and
all the predisposing causes of an international quarrel would be reproduced.
12. It is obvious, then, that the work to be done in Mesopotamia, if regard be had
to its nature and magnitude, to the size of the area concerned, and to the neighbours
with whom the country must stand in relation, is one which can only be performed by a
About this item
- Content
This file contains correspondence, memoranda, maps, manuscript notes, and other papers relating to the political and territorial settlement of parts of the Middle East following the First World War. Many of the papers were collected for the attention of the Middle East Committee (later named the Eastern Committee, following the mergence of the Foreign Office's Russia Committee and the interdepartmental Persia Committee) of the War Cabinet. Contributors include officials from the War Office, Foreign Office, Admiralty, and India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , as well as indivduals such as Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Edward Lawrence. Correspondence comes from representatives of the French and Italian governments as well as British officials in Cairo and other parts of the Middle East.
The papers deal with plans for the region presuming and following an Allied victory in the First World War and take into consideration the imperial ambitions of the victorious European Powers (France, Italy, Russia, Britain, and the United States) and the multitudinous commitments made by the British to various groups. The plans are based on evolving agreements rooted in the Sykes-Picot, or Asia Minor, Agreement between the British and French of 1916. Regions under consideration include the Hejaz (sometimes written Hedjaz), Syria, Northern Iraq, Southern Iraq, Palestine, Armenia, Turkey, the Idrisi state, Yemen, Persia, and Afghanistan. Various matters are covered in the file, but particular focus is given to plans for the Sherifian family of the Hejaz, led by King Husein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī], which impacted upon policy in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine, and the Arabian Peninsula. Other matters include the situation between Jews and Arabs in Palestine, wartime commitments to ruling shaikhs in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , the French position in the region, and desiderata of the Government of India for any peace settlement.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (187 folios)
- Arrangement
The file is arranged in chronological order from the front to the back.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front first page with 1, and terminates at the inside back last page with 187; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [144r] (291/380), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/277, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00005c> [accessed 6 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00005c
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00005c">Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎144r] (291/380)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857499.0x00005c"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/Mss Eur F112_277_0291.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/277
- Title
- Papers on British policy and the Arab movement
- Pages
- 1ar:1av, 1r:14r, 14r:14v, 14v, 22r:59v, 62r:98r, 99v:120v, 125r:133v, 136r:165r, 166r:167r, 167av, 168r:173r, 175r:176v, 178r:187v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎144r] (291/380) Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎144r] (291/380)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/Mss Eur F112_277_0291.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)