Skip to item: of 800
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 4640/1928 Pt 2 ‘Muscat Situation at Sur.’ [‎191r] (392/800)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (396 folios). It was created in 29 Apr 1926-19 Nov 1931. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

Khan Bahadur Kasib and Ali Musa Khan, merchants of Muscat, and to pull
down the forts which they had built. It appeared to Mr. Thomas that the
opposition to this came mainly from the Arama section, and on leaving Sur, in
the Al Sneed, he took in tow an Arama sambuk, which was in the harbour,
whereupon the Arama fired on the Al Saeed. Beyond hitting the funnel
and one of the ship’s boats, no damage was done. The fire was not returned.
The Council lined the Arama section Its. 10,000, but have been unable to
enforce this.
87. In April 1928 the Amirs of the Bani Bu Ali established a new
customs post at Aiqa. Their customs officer wrote to the State Customs
Official at Sur, demanding refund of customs which the State had levied
on the grounds that the boat belonged to the Bani Bu Ali. The Amirs
refused to furnish the Council’s representatives with any explanation
regarding this customs post.
88 . About the same time the Bani Bu Ali stopped a boat belonging to
the Arama section from entering the creek, whereupon the Arama prevented
a Bani Bu Ali boat from entering the creek.
The Bani Bu Ali then occupied BaladAsSur with a view to commanding
the water supply of Sur and obtaining mastery over the town. On the
I5tb April they were attacked in Balad As Sur by about 70 men of the
Arama and Fuwaris under the leadership of Sheikh Yaser al Majaala. The
Arama lost six killed, whilst the Bani Bu Ali lost 10 killed and three wounded.
Sheikh Bashid, Minister for Religious Affairs, accompanied by Saiyid
Shahab, brother of His Highness, went to Sur on the 17th April to try and
settle the dispute. Their reception by the Amirs was not cordial, and they
returned to Muscat on the 23rd April, having failed to accomplish anything.
However, through the intervention of other Sheikhs, the parties came to
terms. The. Arama and Makhana sections each destroyed one of their forts.
All sections of the Jenebeh were to pay $20 on each of their boats to the
Amirs for this year only, and Sheikhs Yaser and Naser bin Mubarak were
to call on the Amirs at Aiqa.
89. On the 25th May the Amirs wrote to the Council of Ministers, stating
that their action had been taken on behalf of the Muscat State and
demanding payment of $10,000 expenses. They attempted to send this
letter to the Council through the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , but it was returned to
them and they w r ei*e informed that if they wished to communicate with the
Council they should do so direct.
90. In May Abdulla bin Saleh, Secretary to Mahomed bin Naser,
proceeded to Bushire to interview the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. . He asserted
the Bani Bu Ali did not recognise the Sultan’s authority and attempted to
get a certificate of identity at the Agency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent. . He was directed to obtain a
passport from the Sultan’s Government.
91. In July 1928 His Highness the Sultan and the Council of Ministers
furnished their views on the situation at Sur. They resented the letters and
actions of the Amirs of Jaalan, realised they were not strong enough
to deal with the situation and asked for the assistance of the British
Government.
92. In August 1928 the Amirs wrote to the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. claiming
that Sur was a part oc their territory, that the Sultan’s W ali was there and
customs collected with their permission, that the town and customs were
under their protection and everything would be accomplished in its proper
time.
93. On the 21st August a party of about 15 Arabs, chiefly of the Fuwaris
section of the Jenebeh, boarded a Cutch Mandvi buggalow Large trading vessel. belonging to
a British subject, Khimji Ramdas, which had arrived from Karachi,
overawed the crew with rifles and daggers, and made off with 22 bags of
rice and Rs. 200 worth of personal property belonging to the Nakhoda. Most
of the culprits are known. The Council of Ministers arrested one of
them in Muscat and are attempting to obtain the surrender of the others
from the Fuwaris Sheikhs.
94. On the night of the 27th August some Arabs climbed over a broken
wall and got into the fort where the Wall lives. They stabbed his two best

About this item

Content

This volume contains papers concerning the situation at Sur in the Sultanate of Muscat and Oman. The papers mainly relate to ‘difficulties’ which had arisen between the tribes of Sur and the Government of Muscat, inter-tribal and inter-factional rivalries, the question of what action the British Government should take to support the authority of the Muscat Government at Sur, and the general question of future British policy in Muscat.

It includes papers relating to the following:

  • The claim to independence of Ali bin Abdullah, Shaikh of the Bani Bu Ali (also spelled Beni Bu Ali) tribe and Amir of Jaalan [Emir of Ja‘alān, also spelled Jalan and Jallan]
  • The bombardment of the fort of Said bin Abdullah (also spelled Saeed bin Abdullah) by the Muscat gunboat, and the shelling and destruction of the fort by HMS Cyclamen
  • An incident in which a Hinawi caravan was stopped at Sur by the Amirs of Jaalan, who hoisted a flag in their fort at Aiqa (also spelled Aigah in the volume) which was reportedly the flag of King Ibn Saud, but which the Amirs of Jaalan subsequently stated was their own flag
  • The Government of India’s recommendation that a regiment be sent to hold Sur
  • Tribal conflict and rivalries, including the feud between the two main sections of the Jenebeh [al-Janabah] tribe, the Makhanah and the Aramah, which the British Government viewed as being encouraged by Ali bin Abdullah, and the feud between the Beni Bu Ali and the Beni Bu Hassan tribes
  • Proposed air operations by aircraft supported by HM Ships against the Bani Bu Ali at Sur.

The papers mainly consist of correspondence, memoranda, reports, and India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Political Department minute papers.

The main correspondents are as follows: the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ; the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. and HBM Consul, Muscat; Mahomed bin Nasir Ali Hamud, Amir of Jalan; the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; the Government of India Foreign and Political Department; the Admiralty; the Foreign Office; the Commander-in-Chief, East Indies; and the Air Ministry.

The volume includes a divider which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 volume (396 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

The subject 4640 (Muscat) consists of two volumes and one file, IOR/L/PS/10/1275-1277. The volumes and file are divided into two parts, with part 2 comprising one volume, and part 4 comprising the second volume and the file. There is no part 1 or part 3.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1 and terminates at the last folio with 392; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The foliation sequence does not include the front and back covers, nor does it include the leading and ending flyleaves.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 4640/1928 Pt 2 ‘Muscat Situation at Sur.’ [‎191r] (392/800), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/1275, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100080848157.0x0000c1> [accessed 10 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100080848157.0x0000c1">File 4640/1928 Pt 2 ‘Muscat Situation at Sur.’ [&lrm;191r] (392/800)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100080848157.0x0000c1">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x0002e5/IOR_L_PS_10_1275_0392.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x0002e5/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image