File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [185r] (374/1150)
The record is made up of 1 volume (573 folios). It was created in 5 Dec 1921-28 Jan 1931. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
)
I
[This Document is the Pr ope rty of His Britannic Majesty's Government.]
PERSIA.
i 1 / 14 /
[March 28, 1927.]
CONFIDENTIAL.
ii .....
; o o /
Section 3.
[E 1473/201/34]
No. 1.
Sir E. Clive to Sir Austen Chamberlain.—(Received March 28.)
(No. 115.)
Sir, _ Tehran, March 11, 1927.
AT an audience I had with the Shah yesterday afternoon, I began by congratulating
His Majesty on the fact that, after more than forty years of discussion, the Persian
Government had at length, thanks to the initiative of His Majesty, decided on the
construction of a trunk line. It is no exaggeration to say that His Majesty beamed
with pleasure at my remark. He said : u Yes ; I am in love with the railway project,”
and proceeded to talk enthusiastically of the great benefits it would confer.
2. When for a moment the flow of words ceased I said that His Majesty’s
Government naturally took a very great interest in the scheme and I had reported
fully on tjie Railway Bill. There were, however, one or two points on which I should
be glad of enlightenment. For instance, if construction were to be begun simultaneously
at Bandar-i-Gaz and at Mohammerah it was only to be expected that the northern
section to Tehran, which was only about one-third of the length of the southern section,
would be completed several years in advance. I had understood that one of the chief
anxieties of the Persian Government was to provide new outlets for the trade of the
northern provinces. It seemed to me, however, assuming I was correct in thinking
that the northern section w r ould be finished first, that the immediate result would be
to provide Russia with a new route for her own imports into Persia without in any way
helping the trade of Mazanderan and Gilan.
3. His Majesty replied that there was no intention of allowing the northern
section to be completed first. Construction would be begun at several different points
along the route and the southern section, wdiich, he remarked, would greatly benefit
the Anglo-Persian Oil Company by providing new markets for the sale of their oil,
would be completed as soon as the northern one. I enquired about the gauge. His
Majesty appeared to have some difficulty in understanding what was meant. Finally,
he laughed and said Persia would have a gauge of her own, neither the Russian gauge
nor the English gauge nor any other known gauge. I said I was interested to hear
this, as the Tabriz-Julfa Railway had the Russian gauge. His Majesty repeated that
on no account would the Russian gauge be selected.
4. I then asked about the financial side : whether His Majesty was satisfied that
Persia could pay for this line out of her own revenues. His Majesty said : Certainly,
the proceeds of the sugar and tea monopoly would in the course of the next ten years,
added to the sum at present in hand (about 8,000,000
tomans
10,000 Persian dinars, or a gold coin of that value.
), provide the capital
required. 1 made no comment, and we passed to other subjects.
5. I had rather the impression of a child looking forward to a new toy on his
birthday. His Majesty was childishly enthusiastic, and appeared to have an equally
childish disregard for the difficulties ahead.
6. It may be of interest therefore to record views expressed in other quarters.
Prince Firuz, the Minister of Finance, who is unquestionably one of the most intelligent
members of the present Cabinet, expressed to me both indifference to and scepticism
; ^ to the scheme—indifference because I imagine he thinks it will never materialise and
scepticism because he thinks the proposed route is the wrong one, and if there is
; to be a railway at all it should go east and west in order to find an outlet on the
Mediterranean.
7. Jam (Mudir-ul-Mulk), a man who is universally liked and holds an important
position as assistant to the Prime Minister—a permanent post, which resembles rather
what we should call secretary to the Cabinet—expressed to me much the same views,
l . was in favour of a railway, but with an east and west alignment. He argued that
with the present Turkish railway scheme the policy of Persia should be eventually to
link up in the west.
Finally, the Chief of the General Staff expressed to the military attache in the
most categorical terms his opposition to the building of any rail way sin Persia at all.
e ore shadowed the time some years ahead when a few rusty rails and a heavy
[72 ee—3]
About this item
- Content
This volume contains papers relating to the construction of the Trans-Persian Railway. It contains material relating to:
- The Persian Railway Syndicate’s attempt to enlist the aid of Rabbi Joseph Saul Kornfeld, the United States Envoy to Persia [Iran], and the British Foreign Office’s subsequent unfavourable attitude towards the Syndicate
- The Persian Railway Syndicate’s proposal to invite American companies for the construction of railways in Persia
- The concessions for the Mohammerah [Khorramshahr]-Khanakin [Khanaqin] and Khanakin-Tehran railways
- The proposed railway from Khanakin to Tehran and the estimated cost for the three principal divisions of the railway
- The restrictions of the British Government on the Persian Railway Syndicate’s grant of a loan to the Persian Government
- The possibility of a ‘fusion of interests’ between the Persian Railway Syndicate and the Stronach Dutton System of Road Rails Limited
- The possible extension of the American Chester Group’s railway concession from Turkey into Persia
- The plans of the Prime Minister of Persia [Rezā Khān Sardār Leader of a tribe or a polity; also refers to a military rank or title given to a commander of an army or division. Sepah] for a railway line extending from Ahwaz [Ahvaz] to Khorramabad, Dizful [Dezful], and Sultanabad [Arak] to Tehran
- The endeavour of an American group to obtain a concession for a line from Mohammerah to Khorramabad and Tehran
- The expenditures of the Persian Railway Syndicate for the Khanakin-Tehran and the Mohamerah-Khoramabad surveys
- The possibility of forming a Railway Syndicate with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and Standard Oil Company
- The Persian Government’s decision to carry out a survey of the Mohammerah-Tehran-Bandar-i Gez [Bandar-i Gaz] railway line with the assistance of a German engineer
- The Consortium industriel pour l’Orient’s proposal to build a railway connecting Meshed [Mashhad] to the Tripoli-Homs Line
- The preference of the British Army Council and the Air Council for an East-West rather than a North-South railway in Persia for strategic reasons
- The exploitation of coal and iron deposits in Mazanderan [Mazandaran] for the construction of railways in Persia, and the concerns of Russia about a Trans-Persian Railway connecting the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. to the Caspian Sea
- The Act of the Persian Majlis [Parliament] for the construction of the Persian Trunk Railway
- The Persian Majlis’s Passage of the Bill for Railway Survey and Construction
- The Persian Majlis’s passage of the Railway Construction Bill, from Mohammerah and Bandar-i Gez to Tehran
- The Persian Majlis’s passage of a law for constructing a railway between Khor Musa-Mohammerah-Bandar-i Gez;
- The Persian Majlis’s authorisation of the Minister of Public Work to employ foreign experts for the construction of the Railway;
- The inauguration of the Bandar-i Gaz-Tehran-Ahwaz Railway in the presence of the Shah of Persia [Rezā Shāh Pahlavi]
- The British concerns and preference for a British rather than an American firm to build the Southern Section of the Railway
- The passage of the Railway Survey Law by the Persian Majlis and the contract between the Persian Government and the American company Ulen, and two German companies, Philipp Holzmann and Julius Berger-Siemens Union [sic., Siemens Bauunion] to carry out a complete survey of the Railway
- The contract between the Persian Government, represented by Minister of Public Works [General Ḥabib Allāh Khān Shaybānī], and the Persian Railway Syndicate, represented by MD Carrel and MNS Mavrogordato
- The contracts between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate for the constructions of ports at Bandar-i Qays and Khor Musa (Bandar-i Shahpur) and a dam over the Karun River at Ahwaz
- The plans for building the line from Bandar Shapur north of Ahwaz, and revival of the line from Hamadan to Tehran
- The construction of the railway lines from Bandar Shah and Khor Musa, the diversion of German resources to the construction of electrical and cement works, and the postponement of building a port at Khor Musa
- The reservations of the British Minister in Persia [Robert Henry Clive] about the construction of the Railway as opposed to motor roads in Persia, and the subsidisation of the enterprise through the tea and sugar monopolies
- The increase in the cost of the Southern Section of the Railway and predicted opposition of the Persian Government
- The visit by the Shah of Persia to the Southern Section of the Railway, his unfavourable impression of the state of the railway, and the American Minister in Persia’s advice to Ulen and Company to stop working on the railway in case of difficulties with the Persian Government
- The cancellation of the contract between the Persian Government and the Persian Railway Syndicate over delayed payments, and the agreement between the German and Ulen groups within the Syndicate to work on the Northern and Southern sections of the Trans-Persian Railway respectively
- The Anglo-Persian Oil Company’s concerns about the Railway providing greater access and mobility to the Russians
- The dispute between the Persian Government and the German-American syndicate for the construction of the Railway
- The negotiations between the Persian Government and the German companies Julius Berger Konsortium, Philipp Holzmann, and Siemens Bauunion for the construction of the Northern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway
- The possible takeover by the Batignolles Construction Company of the building of the Southern Section of the Trans-Persian Railway from the American and British companies Ulen and Company and Stewart and McDonnell
- The Persian Government’s appointment of Suzuki Hajime from the Japanese Railway Department’s Engineering Bureau
- The breakdown of negotiations between the Batignolles Construction Company and the Government of Persia, and the latter’s decision to proceed with the construction of the remaining sections of the railway
- The proposals of the Batignolles Construction Company to the Government of Persia in the absence of a contract
- The extension of the Southern Section of the Railway from Khor Musa to Dizful, Hamadan and Kazvin [Qazvin], and the Northern Section from Tehran to Sari and the southern coast of the Caspian Sea.
The volume also includes the following sketch maps:
- A sketch map of the Trans-Persian Railway, from Khor Musa to Sari and the coast of the Caspian Sea, showing the ‘Line Completed’, ‘Line Surveyed’, and ‘Division between the Northern and Southern Sections’ (f 14)
- A sketch map of the Northern Section of the Railway, showing the routes to Pahlavi, Semnan, and Balfurush [Barfurush], with a second map of the Southern Section, showing alternative routes and termini, running either from Mohammerah or Khor Musa to Dizful and Hamadan (f 156)
- A sketch map showing the existing and projected railways in Persia (f 204).
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (573 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 357 (Persia: Railways) consists of two volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/793-794. The volumes are divided into two parts, with each part comprising one volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: The foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1 and terminates at the inside back cover with 573; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [185r] (374/1150), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/794, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100110106180.0x0000af> [accessed 12 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106180.0x0000af
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106180.0x0000af">File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎185r] (374/1150)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100110106180.0x0000af"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0374.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/794
- Title
- File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, 2r:13v, 15r:18v, 19v:23v, 24v:31v, 35v:38v, 39v:42v, 45v:48v, 56v:57v, 58v:62v, 64r:98v, 99v:106v, 110r:117v, 118v:122v, 123v, 125r:126v, 128r:148v, 150v:155v, 157r:163v, 165r:169v, 171r:173v, 175r:181v, 182v:188v, 190r:203v, 205r:206v, 208r:226r, 227v:266v, 268r:489v, 490v, 494v, 498v, 502v, 507v:523v, 524v:526v, 534v:544v, 545v:546v, 547v, 548v:552v, 553v:555v, 557v:572v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎185r] (374/1150) File 357/1919 Pt 2 ‘RAILWAYS IN PERSIA’ [‎185r] (374/1150)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002b0/IOR_L_PS_10_794_0374.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)