Skip to item: of 578
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 2879/1919 Pt 1 ‘MESOPOTAMIA Kurdistan: The Suleimanieh Outbreak’ [‎236r] (59/156)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 item (78 folios). It was created in 25 May 1919-22 Dec 1921. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

giving '
effect to policy approve,! by His Ma e tV’s Government'Z'qtb m " 6 ? 881 ' 47 ° f « ivin *
. Kurdish States, but degree of suDei vis^u 1 ° M Y for -^tonoraous
(? country) and strategical considerations. Supervision mustbe'reW^ 8 ! t,le
in Sulennamyah division because of its •recoranlinnl’oml strnm r ^ el8 . t ‘ Ve ^ clo ? e , r
(? last paragraph of) my telegram 25th \hv 'iSt;7”'1 Hategical situation, mde
country ami desire of people t^ "T ° f
the hands of private owners and is capable of immense develonm’ent rll < 111
centre of tobacco industry and very rich in pastoral and forest produce. " 1 &
tins is the case Persian frontier tribes are unlikely to constitute se ious menace o
Suleiman,yah whereas inhabitants of Suleimaniyali Division, if left to he nercy of
heir own rulers, would permanently menace Kifri and Kirkuk and 1 Id create a
frontier problem requiring more troops than at present *
Frontier problem will be created only if Kurdistan is left to its own devices
Railway and roads will enable inhabitants to turn their hands to deveYopmeid of
countiy. \\e have seen this happen m four years on Fuphrates to almost (all
cuibsYtioii 6 '' 1 an<1 ' S ° “ Wlil amou « st K '’ i: ' (ls . "’h° are on higlier scale of
M.rlnfx'SfoinlVr 1 *"’ “ 1, " sh "“' 1 ’ ■**»« X - - 23,1,
Line has been recognised by practically every railway expert as bein°- only
alignment bkely to be profitable, and fuller investigation last two years completely
benefits * 118 Vle ' V 1 legald econom,c advantages as even greater than military
ft passes through oilfield of proved value, through principal wheat-growing
act of Mesopo„amia and will tap forest and pastoral produce we badly need.
J respects of mineral wealth are uncertain but not negligible.
-p 5. Strategical aspect of maintenance of civil administration at Rowanduz. From
. Lrbil to I'shnu is a little over 100 miles and a fair motor-road alreadv exists for
l al 4°i f -n my t f egram 8543 of 30th J«ly. The completion of railway to
(. -Lrbii and of this road would not only ensure profitable traffic to railway, but
would change the whole current of trade with Persia and add 23,000 000 to our
annual imports of British goods. Our ultimate political action in regard to Rowanduz
must, however, depend on our railway and road and commercial policy.
^ e ^ re now making experiments thereof leaving Kurds to their own devices,
hirst results are not encouraging either to us or to Kurdistan.
and in Central Kurdistan we believe that to be almost (all) exclusively due
to O.U.l. propaganda and exaggerated rumours of future Armenia (not British).
boiegoing has full concurrence of General Officer Commanding-in-Chief.

About this item

Content

This item relates to the seizure of the ‘reins of government’ (f 283) in Suleimaniyeh [As Sulaymaniyah, also spelled Suleman Iyeh in this item], south Kurdistan, 25 May 1919, during an uprising led by Sheikh Mahmud [Shaikh Maḥmūd Barzanjī], and British military operations leading to the British Mesopotamian Army occupying the Suleimaniyeh Valley in June 1919. The papers notably cover:

  • British concerns about the Kurdish independence movement, including the purported influence of the Turkish Committee of Union and Progress and Persian Kurdistan, and the potential of ‘unrest’ to spread to other parts of Kurdistan and into British controlled Mesopotamia
  • The capture and imprisonment of British officers and staff in Suleimaniyeh, including a list of the missing and interned officers and NCOs [Non-Commissioned Officers] (see ff 251 and 244)
  • British intelligence, regarding the level of Mahmud’s personal as opposed to political ambitions, and casting doubt on the degree of local support for him
  • The concentration of British forces at Kerkouk [Kirkuk] and Chemchemal [Chamchamal] and the desire of the military and political authorities in Baghdad to ‘crush’ (f 255) Mahmud’s movement, recapture Suleimaniyeh, and occupy the Suleimaniyeh Valley
  • The refusal to allow Sheikh Mahmud’s delegates in Aleppo to proceed to Paris to argue the cause of Kurdish independence
  • The British forces’ capture of the Bazyan Pass, advance to Suleiman Iyeh, and collapse of the rising including the arrest of Sheikh Mahmud
  • Discussions concerning the extension of the railway from Kizilrobat [Qizil Ribat, also spelled Kizil Robat in this item] northwards towards Suleimaniyah in order to facilitate the British advance and occupation
  • Restoration of the civil administration in Suleimaniyah by the end of August 1919 and British hopes that Kurdish nationalism will dissipate following Sheikh Mahmud’s military trial and imprisonment in India serving a ten-year sentence
  • Discussions in 1921 between the Colonial Office, India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , High Commissioner for Iraq, and Viceroy of India, on the desirability of reducing the penal sanction against Sheikh Mahmud, and the eventual agreement by the High Commissioner of Iraq to arrange his relocation, under surveillance, in Kuwait [also spelled Koweit in this item].

The primary correspondents are the: General Officer Commanding in Mesopotamia; War Office; India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ; Office of the High Commissioner for Mesopotamia (later Iraq); Secretary of State for the Colonies; Secretary to the Government of Bombay From c. 1668-1858, the East India Company’s administration in the city of Bombay [Mumbai] and western India. From 1858-1947, a subdivision of the British Raj. It was responsible for British relations with the Gulf and Red Sea regions. [Mumbai], Political Department; Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign and Political Department; Political [Agent?], Baghdad; and General [Consul?], Baghdad.

Extent and format
1 item (78 folios)
Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 2879/1919 Pt 1 ‘MESOPOTAMIA Kurdistan: The Suleimanieh Outbreak’ [‎236r] (59/156), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/833/1, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100126901400.0x00004f> [accessed 17 August 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100126901400.0x00004f">File 2879/1919 Pt 1 ‘MESOPOTAMIA Kurdistan: The Suleimanieh Outbreak’ [&lrm;236r] (59/156)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100126901400.0x00004f">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002d7/IOR_L_PS_10_833_0480.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002d7/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image