Skip to item: of 608
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎42v] (93/608)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (295 folios). It was created in 23 Dec 1919-4 Dec 1922. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

2
nir, he did not think that any number of troops would be able to prevent it. The
suppression of internal disorder was, lie considered, already the duty of the Air force. r j
As Sir P. Cox himself suggested, the military position in Iraq would be undoubted! A
stronger when the Air Force assumed command, as by that time the local forces would
have had training and experience. At the same time it had to be recognised th:>|, +H
whole scheme of air control in Iraq was based upon the supposition that there wi
be no external attack in force. The probability of a serious attack by the lurks
seemed very remote under the present conditions.
Mr. Bullard said that any threat of invasion would probably be accompanied by
internal disorder in Kurdistan. The two questions could not really be considered
separately.
Colonel Meinertzhagen pointed out that both questions really turned on the larger
one of whether the General Staff would be prepared, in certain eventualities, to send
an expeditionary force to Iraq. This was a Cabinet question.
The Chairman said that the only answer that could be sent appeared to be that
His Majesty’s Government were prepared to do their best with the forces at their
disposal and with the help of the Arab army and levies, but that no reinforcements
could be expected from overseas. The real issue appeared to him to be that of future
relations with the Nationalist Turks. The only enemy against whom defence would he
needed was the Turk. If His Majesty’s Government were not prepared to delend
Feisal against his only enemy, were they prepared to make peace with that enemy?
If not able to make peace themselves, were they prepared to allow Feisal to make
peace on his own account ? He understood that this question was under consideration
by the Cabinet. At present the situation seemed to be that we wmuld not defend him,
could not make peace with his enemy and would not let him make peace himself.
Mr. Lindsay informed the Committee of the present state of the negotiations with
M. Gounaris with a view to Allied mediation, and indicated that the position was not
entirely hopeless. Much depended on the extent to which the three Allies could make
their views coincide and bring united pressure to bear on the Turks. In view of the
journey to W ashington of M. Briand, he did not think any immediate decision by them
likely. Subject to the views of the War Office representatives, he doubted whether
the Turks would be likely to move anything more than a very small force from the
Greeks to the Iraq frontier just now.
It was decided —
That Sir F. Cox might be informed, with regard to questions 1 and 2 :—
J hat the War Office were of opinion that it would not be possible, with th<
reduced garrison laid down for Iraq, either to repel external attack or t(
suppress internal disorder in Kurdistan,
mt the Air Ministry, while not prepared to give an unqualified answer
considered that, with the eight squadrons of aeroplanes that would be in the
country when the Air Force assumed command, it should be possible at leas'
to c may invasion, if not to repel it. With regard to the second question, th(
tr Ministry representative considered that the suppression of disorder, ii
conjunction with levies, was already one of the functions of the Air Force ii
q!~ 1( ls ^ an > as i n Iraq proper, and did not think that the suggested situatioi
r ! ( mered very greatly from the existing one.
Jhat it might b e suggested to Sir P. Cox that Feisal could be told that Hii
Majesty s Government were prepared to do their best with the means at theii
disposal, on the assumption that they would receive adequate support fron
ie local lorces, but that no reinforcements were to be expected Iron
overseas. 1
With regard to the question as to how long His Majesty's Government woulc
_ 61 ie ! ns ® ves responsible, it was decided that this depended on th<
giessma e y tie Aiab Administration; and that the answer might bf
mandfte 88 ^ Majebty S a ° vernmeil b as mandatory, continue to exercise ihc
It was agreed .that the third and fourth questions dealt with matters in wbict
con AT,!- r o 6 ,? lone . were and need not come under the
consideration of the Committee.
Colonial Office,
November 4, 1921.
(Initialled)

About this item

Content

This volume contains correspondence, memoranda, reports, newspaper clippings, parliamentary notes, telegrams and minutes. It mainly covers conversations between British officials regarding the political situation in Kurdistan, but also contains correspondence from Kurdish representatives and various British organisations.

The volume covers and includes the following:

  • A description of the political situation in Kurdistan by Philippe Berthelot of the French Ministry for Foreign Affairs
  • Opinions expressed by British officials as to whether Turkish authorities should be excluded form Kurdistan, whether Kurdistan should be portioned, and whether its frontier should follow that of the ethnological frontier between Kurds and Arabs
  • Opinions expressed by British officials on the growth of political and social movements related to Kurdish nationalism
  • Descriptions of the political movement towards the establishment of an autonomous Kurdish state
  • The views of Hamdi Bey Baban [Ḥamdī Beg Bābān] regarding the Kurdistan situation
  • Minutes of monthly conferences on Middle Eastern affairs throughout 1920, giving views on Kurdistan from British and French officers and covering different subjects regarding the political situation in Kurdistan and Mesopotamia
  • Aspects of the future administration of Sulaimaniyah [As Sulaymaniyah]
  • Plans from British officers regarding the political situation in Mesopotamia and its possible future government
  • Mentions of interest in Mesopotamia in ‘bolshevism’
  • Reports on India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. recommendations regarding Kurdistan
  • A memorandum on Kurdistan, with the following headings: ‘Kurdish political activity', ‘Aims of the Kurds’, ‘Turkish Scheme’, ‘Kurdish Objections’, ‘The immediate situation’, and ‘Suggested solution’ (ff 267-270)
  • Opinions expressed by Kurdish people on Kurdistan and its politics
  • Conflict in Mesopotamia and Kurdistan regarding: British refusal to allow visits to the tomb of Shaikh Kaka Ahmad [Ḥājjī Kākā Aḥmad al-Shaykh], including the imposition of heavy fines and prison sentences; arrests and deportations to Baghdad of unnamed ‘notables’; and the execution at Sakis [Saqqez] of Rusten Khan [Rustam Khān] by order of the Governor of Sineh [Sanandaj]
  • Correspondence relating to Kurdistan, including: repatriation of Assyrian Christians; securing of borders; Kurdish districts in Persia [Iran;] Kurdish nationalism
  • A letter from the Travellers Club regarding the situation in the Kurdistan.

The principal correspondents are: Civil Commissioner, Baghdad; High Commissioner, Constantinople [Istanbul]; Winston Churchill, Secretary of State for the Colonies; Political Officer at Sulaimaniyah; Hamdi Bey Baban.

The volume includes a divider which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 volume (295 folios)
Arrangement

The volume’s contents are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

The subject 36 (Kurdistan) consists of 2 volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/781-782. The volumes are divided into three parts, with parts 1-2 comprising the first volume and part 3 comprising the second volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the inside last folio with 293; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The volume has four foliation anomalies: f 106a, f 111a, f 172a and f 203a.

A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎42v] (93/608), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/782, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100136722015.0x00005e> [accessed 25 July 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722015.0x00005e">File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [&lrm;42v] (93/608)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722015.0x00005e">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/IOR_L_PS_10_782_0093.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image