File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [207r] (432/608)
The record is made up of 1 volume (295 folios). It was created in 23 Dec 1919-4 Dec 1922. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
KURDISTAN.
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
Recommendations.
No. P. 7701.
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
,
Sir, 20tli December 1919.
With reference to correspondence ending with my endorsement No. 7701, dated
4th December, relative to the policy of His Majesty’s Government in Kurdistan, I am directed
by the Secretary of State for India to transmit, to be laid before the Secretary of State for
Foreign Affairs, copy of telegram dated 27th November, No. 14269, which has been received
from the Acting Civil Commissioner in Mesopotamia on this subject.
2. Mr. Montagu has considered this telegram and examined the whole problem of
Kurdistan in consultation with officers who have had recent experience of these regions, and I
-am to forward herewith copy of the Minutes of a Conference held in this connection at the
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
on Saturday, 6th December.
3. Of the broad alternatives of interference in or withdrawal from the internal affairs of
Kurdistan, Mr. Secretary Montagu would have preferred the latter. But he is compelled to
the conclusion that this is impossible so long as it is necessary to provide for the defence of
Mosul on the north and for the safety of the Persian road on the East. He is advised that if
Mosul is to remain within the Mesopotamian State then the strategical position demands the
holding of Zakho and, with Zakho, Jezirah on the west and Dohuk on the east. Similarly, in
order to protect the Persian road and the railway to Quraitu from raids, a sufficient degree of
control must be exercised over the district of Sulaimaniyah to ensure a measure of order and
good government therein. It is Mr. Montagu’s considered opinion that the number of troops
required on the frontiers of Mesopotamia will be less if such control is exercised than if this
area is left entirely to its own devices. He therefore recommends, though not without
reluctance, that Southern Kurdistan should remain within the sphere of our commitments.
4. As to boundaries, he is anxious to include in the Mesopotamian State no predominantly
Kurdish area which could with safety be excluded. He therefore recommends that the
frontier between Southern Kurdistan and Mesopotamia should be a line passing from a little
north of Khaniqin, to Kifri, thence to Kirkuk, Altun Keupri, Erbil, Dohuk, Zakho to Feish
Khabur. He would include in Mesopotamia all the towns named except Erbil; and to the
Aghas of Erbil, a town which is partly Arab and partly Kurdish, he would give the option of
entering the State either of Mesopotamia or of South Kurdistan. Colonel Leachman is of
opinion that they would most probably elect for the former, an election which would solve
many difficulties that might otherwise arise. The eastern frontier of South Kurdistan
would be the Persian border; and the northern, a line starting from where the Kandil Dagh
joins Persia, along the crest of the mountains to Harir and Kandil, thence (subject to any local
modifications wffiich Colonel Wilson might show to be necessary) along the Zab to the point
where the frontier of the Mesopotamian State crosses the river. For the defence of Zakho it
is necessary that Jezirah ibn Omar be secured. Mr. Montagu would propose to invite the
Bedr Khan family to establish themselves in Bohtan with Jezirah as their capital. At first
it would be advisable to garrison the town with British troops and to lend some assistance in
arms and perhaps in money. But beyond Jezirah itself, and therein only to this limited
extent, there should be no commitments. The further frontiers of Bohtan would be no
concern of His Majesty’s Government.
5. As regards the constitution of South Kurdistan, Mr. Montagu proposes firstly that it
shall form a State financially and politically separate from Mesopotamia, and secondly, that
it shall be autonomous, governed by a Kurdish Executive Council, assisted by, but not
subject to, British advisers appointed by the Chief Civil Authority in Baghdad. He is advised
that it is practicable to unite .Sulaimaniyah and the area between the Zabs into a single State
and he would propose to recommend this course to Colonel Wilson forthwith. With the
natural resources of Kurdistan as great as Colonel Wilson appears to anticipate, the State
should at a very early date attain to financial stability. The elaboration of a customs union
and the division of expenditure incurred in the joint interest of the two. States may present
difficulties, but none that are insuperable ; and Mr. Montagu would be disposed to request
Colonel Wilson to give this phase of the problem his early attention.
10 1249 2 4.20
About this item
- Content
This volume contains correspondence, memoranda, reports, newspaper clippings, parliamentary notes, telegrams and minutes. It mainly covers conversations between British officials regarding the political situation in Kurdistan, but also contains correspondence from Kurdish representatives and various British organisations.
The volume covers and includes the following:
- A description of the political situation in Kurdistan by Philippe Berthelot of the French Ministry for Foreign Affairs
- Opinions expressed by British officials as to whether Turkish authorities should be excluded form Kurdistan, whether Kurdistan should be portioned, and whether its frontier should follow that of the ethnological frontier between Kurds and Arabs
- Opinions expressed by British officials on the growth of political and social movements related to Kurdish nationalism
- Descriptions of the political movement towards the establishment of an autonomous Kurdish state
- The views of Hamdi Bey Baban [Ḥamdī Beg Bābān] regarding the Kurdistan situation
- Minutes of monthly conferences on Middle Eastern affairs throughout 1920, giving views on Kurdistan from British and French officers and covering different subjects regarding the political situation in Kurdistan and Mesopotamia
- Aspects of the future administration of Sulaimaniyah [As Sulaymaniyah]
- Plans from British officers regarding the political situation in Mesopotamia and its possible future government
- Mentions of interest in Mesopotamia in ‘bolshevism’
- Reports on India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. recommendations regarding Kurdistan
- A memorandum on Kurdistan, with the following headings: ‘Kurdish political activity', ‘Aims of the Kurds’, ‘Turkish Scheme’, ‘Kurdish Objections’, ‘The immediate situation’, and ‘Suggested solution’ (ff 267-270)
- Opinions expressed by Kurdish people on Kurdistan and its politics
- Conflict in Mesopotamia and Kurdistan regarding: British refusal to allow visits to the tomb of Shaikh Kaka Ahmad [Ḥājjī Kākā Aḥmad al-Shaykh], including the imposition of heavy fines and prison sentences; arrests and deportations to Baghdad of unnamed ‘notables’; and the execution at Sakis [Saqqez] of Rusten Khan [Rustam Khān] by order of the Governor of Sineh [Sanandaj]
- Correspondence relating to Kurdistan, including: repatriation of Assyrian Christians; securing of borders; Kurdish districts in Persia [Iran;] Kurdish nationalism
- A letter from the Travellers Club regarding the situation in the Kurdistan.
The principal correspondents are: Civil Commissioner, Baghdad; High Commissioner, Constantinople [Istanbul]; Winston Churchill, Secretary of State for the Colonies; Political Officer at Sulaimaniyah; Hamdi Bey Baban.
The volume includes a divider which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (295 folios)
- Arrangement
The volume’s contents are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 36 (Kurdistan) consists of 2 volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/781-782. The volumes are divided into three parts, with parts 1-2 comprising the first volume and part 3 comprising the second volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the inside last folio with 293; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
The volume has four foliation anomalies: f 106a, f 111a, f 172a and f 203a.
A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [207r] (432/608), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/782, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000021> [accessed 14 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000021
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000021">File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎207r] (432/608)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000021"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/IOR_L_PS_10_782_0432.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/782
- Title
- File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, i-r:i-v, 1r:66v, 68r:106v, 106ar:106av, 107r:107v, 109r:111v, 111ar:111av, 112r:125v, 128r:129v, 131r:133v, 136r:138v, 142r:147v, 152r:168v, 168ar:168av, 169r:172v, 172ar:172av, 173r:176v, 178r:203v, 203ar:203av, 204r:285v, 289r:293v, ii-r:ii-v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎207r] (432/608) File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎207r] (432/608)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/IOR_L_PS_10_782_0432.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)