File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [233r] (484/608)
The record is made up of 1 volume (295 folios). It was created in 23 Dec 1919-4 Dec 1922. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
Urumia by arrangement with the Persian Government This
suggestion appeared to contemplate a slight extension ' of the
Lersian frontier which was in his opinion, worth considering and
which might fit m with the desire of His Majesty’s Government to
meet the Peisian aspirations for territorial expansion as far as
possible. Whether it would be equally conducive to the future
security of the Assyrian people he could not say.
The only alternative that had been put forward for the
repatriation of the 1 urkish Assyrians was that they should be
settled m an
enclave
An area of land belonging to one country and entirely surrounded by land of just one other country.
m the neighbourhood of Kochannes and
The War Office appeared also to favour Colonel Wilson’s
suggestions, though the General Officer Commanding, Mesopotamia
pointed out that the inclusion of Jezirat-ibn-Omar in the British
sphere ot influence would necessitate the maintenance and support
of a garrison at a considerable distance from Mosul, which would
present certain difficulties^ It was of course impossible to consider
th l e . t 1 ut 4 l [ re Kurdistan without reference to the degree of connection
wtnch the Turks vyould be able to retain with the Kurdish areas.
G j. ia feared that the complete expulsion of the Turks
from Kurdistan was no longer a practicable proposition, but they did
not think that the retention of Turkish authority uncontrolled in
those areas would necessarily be destructive of the scheme proposed
by them, provided that British influence was sufficiently stronuly
maintained in the suggested Kurdish States of Southern Kurdistan
and the Bohtan.
He would ask the Conference to assist him in arriving at a
proposal to put before the Peace Confer ence.
I hei e were two rather disturbing factors which must not be lost
sight of.. T. he first was that Colonel Wilson had apparently abandoned
his original proposal for a fringe of autonomous Kurdish States
round the northern borders of Mesopotamia ; and the second was
that as a result of persistent and unscrupulous propaganda on the
part of the. Turks, the Kurds themselves now appeared to desire to
retain their connection with the Ottoman Empire. If this were
really the case we could no longer regard them, as we had done
hitherto, as a potentially independent State, anxious to free itself
from Turkish dominion and eager to accept our co-operation to attain
this freedom.
There were two main questions on which he would ask the
Conference to assist him in arriving at a conclusion. Firstly, were
we or were we not to accept the recommendation of Colonel Wilson,
supported as it was by the
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
and the War Office, that we
should accept the responsibility for Southern Kurdistan, and, if so,
should it be incorporated in Mesopotamia or treated differently, as
suggested by the
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
?
Secondly, how were we to fit in our ideas about the future of
Kurdistan with those of the French Government?
Y\ ith regard to the first of these questions, he wished to say
that he personally remained anxious for us to curtail our responsi
bilities as far as we possibly could. He could not help being nervous
about the future, and his anxiety w r as shared by the Cabinet. It
must be remembered that the Cabinet demanded very excellent
reasons in support of any suggestion for the increase of British
military and political commitments. Their attitude might be
described as frankly hostile to any such extension. In reply to the
arguments that Southern Kurdistan was a productive area and had
great potentialities in mineral wealth and tobacco, they not un
naturally replied that these advantages must, be weighed against the
risk to British lives which appeared to be inseparable from our
attempts to obtain control of Kurdish areas.
His own vdew was that it would be preferable to leave Kurdistan
altogether alone. He did not recommend either that it should he
incorporated in the British sphere or that we should establish a kind
About this item
- Content
This volume contains correspondence, memoranda, reports, newspaper clippings, parliamentary notes, telegrams and minutes. It mainly covers conversations between British officials regarding the political situation in Kurdistan, but also contains correspondence from Kurdish representatives and various British organisations.
The volume covers and includes the following:
- A description of the political situation in Kurdistan by Philippe Berthelot of the French Ministry for Foreign Affairs
- Opinions expressed by British officials as to whether Turkish authorities should be excluded form Kurdistan, whether Kurdistan should be portioned, and whether its frontier should follow that of the ethnological frontier between Kurds and Arabs
- Opinions expressed by British officials on the growth of political and social movements related to Kurdish nationalism
- Descriptions of the political movement towards the establishment of an autonomous Kurdish state
- The views of Hamdi Bey Baban [Ḥamdī Beg Bābān] regarding the Kurdistan situation
- Minutes of monthly conferences on Middle Eastern affairs throughout 1920, giving views on Kurdistan from British and French officers and covering different subjects regarding the political situation in Kurdistan and Mesopotamia
- Aspects of the future administration of Sulaimaniyah [As Sulaymaniyah]
- Plans from British officers regarding the political situation in Mesopotamia and its possible future government
- Mentions of interest in Mesopotamia in ‘bolshevism’
- Reports on India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. recommendations regarding Kurdistan
- A memorandum on Kurdistan, with the following headings: ‘Kurdish political activity', ‘Aims of the Kurds’, ‘Turkish Scheme’, ‘Kurdish Objections’, ‘The immediate situation’, and ‘Suggested solution’ (ff 267-270)
- Opinions expressed by Kurdish people on Kurdistan and its politics
- Conflict in Mesopotamia and Kurdistan regarding: British refusal to allow visits to the tomb of Shaikh Kaka Ahmad [Ḥājjī Kākā Aḥmad al-Shaykh], including the imposition of heavy fines and prison sentences; arrests and deportations to Baghdad of unnamed ‘notables’; and the execution at Sakis [Saqqez] of Rusten Khan [Rustam Khān] by order of the Governor of Sineh [Sanandaj]
- Correspondence relating to Kurdistan, including: repatriation of Assyrian Christians; securing of borders; Kurdish districts in Persia [Iran;] Kurdish nationalism
- A letter from the Travellers Club regarding the situation in the Kurdistan.
The principal correspondents are: Civil Commissioner, Baghdad; High Commissioner, Constantinople [Istanbul]; Winston Churchill, Secretary of State for the Colonies; Political Officer at Sulaimaniyah; Hamdi Bey Baban.
The volume includes a divider which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (295 folios)
- Arrangement
The volume’s contents are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 36 (Kurdistan) consists of 2 volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/781-782. The volumes are divided into three parts, with parts 1-2 comprising the first volume and part 3 comprising the second volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the inside last folio with 293; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
The volume has four foliation anomalies: f 106a, f 111a, f 172a and f 203a.
A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [233r] (484/608), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/782, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000055> [accessed 2 August 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000055
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000055">File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎233r] (484/608)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x000055"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/IOR_L_PS_10_782_0484.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/782
- Title
- File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, i-r:i-v, 1r:66v, 68r:106v, 106ar:106av, 107r:107v, 109r:111v, 111ar:111av, 112r:125v, 128r:129v, 131r:133v, 136r:138v, 142r:147v, 152r:168v, 168ar:168av, 169r:172v, 172ar:172av, 173r:176v, 178r:203v, 203ar:203av, 204r:285v, 289r:293v, ii-r:ii-v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎233r] (484/608) File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎233r] (484/608)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/IOR_L_PS_10_782_0484.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)