File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [282v] (583/608)
The record is made up of 1 volume (295 folios). It was created in 23 Dec 1919-4 Dec 1922. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
9
The inference is that he had contemplated an American mandate for the six
Armenian vilayets.
2. He attached no significance to Major Noel’s arguments that Kurdistan should
not be partitioned. While there might be reasons against the exclusion of Southern
Kurdistan from a united Kurdistan under a single mandatory, there was, in his opi, j
no such feeling of national unity among the Kurds as to render it essential for the
whole of Kurdistan to be treated in the same way in the absence of a mandatory
power. Nor did he agree that the Kurds, if left to themselves, would be strongly
pro-British. ^ ^
3. He did not regard ethnological frontiers as being necessarily good ones. He
thought that economic and geographical frontiers tended in practice to outweigh those
of race. The only safe and reasonable frontier from a political point of view seemed to
him to be that which he had outlined in June 1919. The suggestion referred to was as
follows:—
•‘For economic and strategic reasons, and in order to secure to Iraq State the
advantage of a mountain track, well wooded and capable of great development, it
is desirable to include Suleimaniyeh, Rania, and Keui Sandjak within limits of
Mesopotamian administration.
“ Erbil is an integral part of Mosul vilayet, and when I visited the town by
air on the 6th June leading inhabitants were unanimous in their expressions of
dismay at the mere prospect of being included in Kurdistan. Erbil, moreover, is
on one of the recognised railway alignments to Mosul, and, like Agra, should ’be
excluded from Kurdistan.
“ Dohuk and Zakho must also be regarded as within Mesopotamia, but not
* Amadia.”
[163477]
I.D.C.E. 3946.
r J^. 28t | 1 November Colonel Wilson telegraphed that there was no point of
policy affecting Mesopotamia on which he spoke with greater conviction, nor one on
which the railway experts were more unanimous than the Kifri-Kirkuk railway line,
tie still recommended strongly that this should be proceeded with, and referred to the
telegram m which he had originally suggested it. In this telegram he had said
1 (0
ifstrat®!
ilusion*
is$ ei
inorted
’’On 0 1
m ofe
outside bac
i over
| propaganda
tie Kurds
Not
tlemajorit;
pmunicai
' festern K
lirs in tl
s annex Ki
iderthen
fikyet of I
uber of i
fiopps whc
[158768]
i n ^ l 8 doubtless realised that Baghdad-Mosul line passes through almost the
whole ot its length through desert country which is not even potentials fertile
except between Baghdad and Samarrah. The alignment has been designed with
an eye to through communication between Aleppo and Baghdad ; for development
ot country (corrupt group) at length alignment would be Khanikin-Kifri-Kirkuk-
A tun Keupri-Arbil-Mosul with branches to Suleimaniyeh and Rania, but we are
PvIf P Tl SUmab i ly /u mnil 3 tt ? d t0 the Ti ^ ris route - Whether or not Mosul is
i e . Xcluded + ^ Ild y y a( l s P here is limited by Greater Zab, it will still be
■R • ° £P ve e ec policy recently adumbrated for Kurdistan by carrying out
foregomg radway northwards from Tehrit up the Lesser Zab to Altun KeuprCand
control ^ ^ 1S h w 1 aS e 1 ssen r tlal lf are to exercise any degree of effective
would oals ^y f and b hfcre , by [ ?u P hold ] the destinies of Armenians; the line
the north eit g l T y I®!^ y ieat -g rowin g country, and could be extended to
e north-east eventually if desired. It could be surveyed forthwith.
face us ir, 00 ^ 8 T/° n V '\° U d s . (dve au f or,la tically many of the problems which now
extension^f A 1 T Qenia ’ and North-West Persia, and might make an
extension of the Khanikm line to Kermanshah unnecessary for the present.
nolitic d imn^rfa a , 1S ° 1 e north-west limit of Iraq, it becomes of primary
this obieot wp ° i^^l mos ^ of Suleimaniyeh as a Kurdish centre; with
to Halebia nlain • ext ® nd me ^ e g a nge system from Khanikin up the Diala
The Ottoman T 1 ° ooimamyeh f his line would almost certainly be profitable,
profit out of th° f C K° e ^ 1L 18 u ? ders . tood have made 100,000L per annum net
for everv sort of l ° , aCG ° 1 m f^is district before the war, and it is a market
I recommend ih t U n a and Por ® st P r °dnce as well as a fine wheat-growing area.
1 recommend that this be surveyed as soon as possible.”
I.D.C.E. 3818. Suleimaniveh^^id^F 6 }?^ ^ ^ vd Commissioner reported that he had visited
to moXfyThe ^ewf.l I and tbat nothin g he had seen heard there led him
beginning to comp rea V expressed. He added that geological reports were now
potentialities than bp^ , these areas and that they disclosed greater
P tentiianties than he had hitherto anticipated, particularly of oil.
iak had
m
anc
racting
Kurdistan
^ Arab i
6a ter into s
ibe Kurdigi
oilier regir
aominal su
wuncils u
as
op(
At tl:
td Cur;
un
l.Nc
2. ( Tu
3. Tb
[U
About this item
- Content
This volume contains correspondence, memoranda, reports, newspaper clippings, parliamentary notes, telegrams and minutes. It mainly covers conversations between British officials regarding the political situation in Kurdistan, but also contains correspondence from Kurdish representatives and various British organisations.
The volume covers and includes the following:
- A description of the political situation in Kurdistan by Philippe Berthelot of the French Ministry for Foreign Affairs
- Opinions expressed by British officials as to whether Turkish authorities should be excluded form Kurdistan, whether Kurdistan should be portioned, and whether its frontier should follow that of the ethnological frontier between Kurds and Arabs
- Opinions expressed by British officials on the growth of political and social movements related to Kurdish nationalism
- Descriptions of the political movement towards the establishment of an autonomous Kurdish state
- The views of Hamdi Bey Baban [Ḥamdī Beg Bābān] regarding the Kurdistan situation
- Minutes of monthly conferences on Middle Eastern affairs throughout 1920, giving views on Kurdistan from British and French officers and covering different subjects regarding the political situation in Kurdistan and Mesopotamia
- Aspects of the future administration of Sulaimaniyah [As Sulaymaniyah]
- Plans from British officers regarding the political situation in Mesopotamia and its possible future government
- Mentions of interest in Mesopotamia in ‘bolshevism’
- Reports on India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. recommendations regarding Kurdistan
- A memorandum on Kurdistan, with the following headings: ‘Kurdish political activity', ‘Aims of the Kurds’, ‘Turkish Scheme’, ‘Kurdish Objections’, ‘The immediate situation’, and ‘Suggested solution’ (ff 267-270)
- Opinions expressed by Kurdish people on Kurdistan and its politics
- Conflict in Mesopotamia and Kurdistan regarding: British refusal to allow visits to the tomb of Shaikh Kaka Ahmad [Ḥājjī Kākā Aḥmad al-Shaykh], including the imposition of heavy fines and prison sentences; arrests and deportations to Baghdad of unnamed ‘notables’; and the execution at Sakis [Saqqez] of Rusten Khan [Rustam Khān] by order of the Governor of Sineh [Sanandaj]
- Correspondence relating to Kurdistan, including: repatriation of Assyrian Christians; securing of borders; Kurdish districts in Persia [Iran;] Kurdish nationalism
- A letter from the Travellers Club regarding the situation in the Kurdistan.
The principal correspondents are: Civil Commissioner, Baghdad; High Commissioner, Constantinople [Istanbul]; Winston Churchill, Secretary of State for the Colonies; Political Officer at Sulaimaniyah; Hamdi Bey Baban.
The volume includes a divider which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (295 folios)
- Arrangement
The volume’s contents are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 36 (Kurdistan) consists of 2 volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/781-782. The volumes are divided into three parts, with parts 1-2 comprising the first volume and part 3 comprising the second volume.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the inside last folio with 293; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
The volume has four foliation anomalies: f 106a, f 111a, f 172a and f 203a.
A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [282v] (583/608), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/782, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x0000b8> [accessed 16 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x0000b8
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x0000b8">File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎282v] (583/608)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100136722017.0x0000b8"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/IOR_L_PS_10_782_0583.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/782
- Title
- File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, i-r:i-v, 1r:66v, 68r:106v, 106ar:106av, 107r:107v, 109r:111v, 111ar:111av, 112r:125v, 128r:129v, 131r:133v, 136r:138v, 142r:147v, 152r:168v, 168ar:168av, 169r:172v, 172ar:172av, 173r:176v, 178r:203v, 203ar:203av, 204r:285v, 289r:293v, ii-r:ii-v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎282v] (583/608) File 36/1919 Pt 3 ‘KURDISTAN POLICY & SITUATION’ [‎282v] (583/608)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002a4/IOR_L_PS_10_782_0583.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)