Skip to item: of 248
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎21v] (42/248)

The record is made up of 1 volume (122 folios). It was created in 1906-1918. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

40 PART VIIL—ARMAMENT, EQUIPMENT, REINFORCEMENTS, ETC.
Drafts and Reinforcements.
the “ first reinforcements ” long before they were sent to Mesopotamia, this applying
equally to British and Indian troops, whilst with regard to those sent direct from India
to Mesopotamia, even those that mobilised with their full personnel were soon in need of
reinforcing drafts.
Drafts for British Troops.
13. Each British infantry unit ordered on service was supposed to have 25 per cent,
of its strength at its depot in India, and each Cavalry Regiment 33 per cent., to replace
wastage until drafts arrived from home. When these depots were exhausted, it devolved
upon the War Office to keep British Units in Mesopotamia up to strength, and each unit,
no doubt, had or should have had a depot or reserve battalion in England preparing
and training men to replace casualties. There were a few reservists in India, numbering
altogether 651, of whom 255 in private employ were called up in August. 1914, whilst the
remainder in Government and Railway employment were not called up till later, and then
only those employed by the railways, an effort which produced another 250 ; but no doubt
India looked, and we think rightly, to the War Office to keep the British units supplied
with suitable and sufficient drafts.
Sir Beauchamp Duff tells us, however, that not till October, 1915, a year after the first
landing, were any drafts sent to India or Mesopotamia by the War Office. On May 21 st,
1915, the War Office wires as follows to the Commander-in-Chief, India :—
Owing to great and increased losses which you, no doubt, know of, every available man is now required
to replace casualties ; consequently, though we will bear in mind your request, we cannot bind ourselves a*
to when we can meet your needs. This refers to your telegram of May, 1915, No. S. 10101.
No real blame can be attached to the War Office for this shortage of drafts. It arose
from the imperative necessity of replacing losses incurred in France and Gallipoli, but the
failure of the War Office to keep to the previous understanding did unquestionably embar
rass the Indian Military Authorities.
The effect of this inability to provide drafts is illustrated by General Townshend’s
statement, that on October 3rd, his English battalions were reduced to mere half battalions.
This description is perhaps not quite accurate, but Major Bastow speaking more precisely
has told us that at the battle of Ctesiphon the strength of the British Battalions were :—
Dorsets, 573 ; Norfolks, 520 ; and 1 st Oxfords, 619. The full strength of these battalions
should have been some 2,500, and they were therefore nearly 33 per cent, below
establishment in effectives at this important battle. What the state of these battalions
would have been had they not been supplied with drafts from Territorial Regiments in
India may be well imagined.
Drafts for Indian Troops.
14. The regulations applicable to Indian troops require men to serve 25 years for a
pension. Such a system means that there must be a large number of men in the ranks
who would be entirely unfit for the rigours of active service, and its effect is illus
trated by the fact that the Indian Government were requested to send to France no men
who had had more than fifteen years’ service. It was obvious beforehand, therefore, that
there would be need for abundant drafts to take the place of unfit men in any active
operations in which Indian troops ■were engaged.
But our evidence shows that the supply of drafts to Indian battalions at the commence
ment of the campaign from the Army reserve was a complete failure. Sir Beauchamp Duff
told us that this reserve for the Indian Army Units proved practically of no value. In
fact, we do not hesitate to say that the Indian reserve system entirely broke down under
the stress of war conditions. These reserves either as regards numbers, in all some 30,000,
or efficiency were quite unable to meet the calls made upon them to maintain the strength
of the Divisions sent to France; in fact it was only on the recall of these Divisions, and
consequent lowering of the numbers of casualties, that the authorities in India were in
any way able to overtake the wastage in Mesopotamia. After that, though a great strain
was felt during the efforts to relieve the garrison of Kut, when the casualties to Indian troops
amounted to very nearly 20 , 000 , the wastage was fairly well met with new recruits from
India. But we cannot believe that the steps taken to obtain recruits were very thorough.
For instance, recruiting officers, who in peace time numbered 9, were only increased to 10

About this item

Content

A signed proof, folios 1-100, plus additional material, folios 101-124. The cover bears the signature of Sir Arthur Hirtzel, Assistant Under-Secretary of State. The report has been annotated in blue pencil at various points.

Contents:

  • 'Part I. Preface.
  • 'Part II. Origin of Mesopotamia [Iraq] Expedition.'
  • 'Part III. Advance from Basra to Kurna.'
  • 'Part IV. The Advance to Amara [Al-'Amārah] and Kut [Al-Kūt].'
  • 'Part V. Correspondence and Telegrams as to Advance on Baghdad.'
  • 'Part VI. The Advance from Kut to Ctesiphon.'
  • 'Part VII. Operations for Relief of Kut.'
  • 'Part VIII. Armament, Equipment, Reinforcements, &c.'
  • 'Part IX. Transport.'
  • 'Part X. Medical Breakdown.'
  • 'Part XI. Causes Contributing to the Errors of Judgement and Shortcomings of Responsible Authorities.'
  • 'Part XII. Findings and Conclusions. Recommendations.'
  • 'Separate Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP.'
  • 'Appendix I. Vincent-Bingley Report.'
  • 'Appendix II. Memorandum by Sir Beauchamp Duff.'
  • 'Appendix III. Colonel Hehir's Account of the Siege of Kut-el-Amara.'

Additional material:

  • Folio 101. Manuscript note [by Arthur Hirtzel] on net military expenditure.
  • Folios 102-109. Copy of the East India (Army Administration), Further Papers regarding the Administration of the Army in India , 1906.
  • Folios 110-115. Manuscript notes, titled 'Suggested redraft & amplification of second half of parag 1' [unknown hand].
  • Folio 116. A clipping from the Daily Telegraph , Wednesday 4 July 1917, featuring an article titled 'Mesopotamia. Ex-Viceroy's Statement. The Medical Breakdown.'
  • Folios 117-124. An expanded typescript version of Hirtzel's manuscript notes (folio 101).
Extent and format
1 volume (122 folios)
Arrangement

A table of contents can be found at folio 4v.

An index can be found at folios 93-97.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 124; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 110-115; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence. The volume comprises a stitched pamphlet, and other stitched and loose-leaf material.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎21v] (42/248), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/20/257, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00002b> [accessed 20 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00002b">'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [&lrm;21v] (42/248)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00002b">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/IOR_L_PS_20_257_0042.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image