Skip to item: of 644
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎205r] (409/644)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (320 folios). It was created in 6 Dec 1933-27 Mar 1947. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

19
Iranian Jurisdiction over the Outer Anchorage at Bushire.
69. At the end of 1936 a German member of the crew of the Hansa Line
vessel Geierfels was prosecuted by two coolies A term used to describe labourers from a number of Asian countries, now considered derogatory. for an assault said to have been
^ committed on the ship while she was lying at the outer anchorage at Bushire.
The outer anchorage lies some 7 miles from the shore, and therefore outside the
limit of territorial waters as recognised by His Majesty’s Government in the
United Kingdom. The German Legation decided that the sailor, who had left
Bushire with his ship for Bandar Shahpur, must be surrendered to the
Iranian authorities, and he was brought back to Bushire for trial. A
precedent was thus created for the exercise by the Iranian authorities of
criminal jurisdiction over ships at the outer anchorage, and the Political
Resident in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. requested instructions regarding the action
which he should take if a similar case arose involving a British subject
or British-protected person. The point was referred to the Foreign Office,
who replied that for practical reasons it seemed desirable to recognise
Iranian jurisdiction over the outer anchorage at Bushire. The attitude
of His Majesty’s Government with regard to the limit of territorial waters
could be safeguarded by informing the Iranian Government officially that
His Majesty’s Government had decided unilaterally to recognise this jurisdiction
in view of the special circumstances obtaining at Bushire, but no such communi
cation need be made until a concrete case had arisen. His Majesty’s Minister
informed the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. that, subject to the latter’s views (not received
before the year closed), he agreed that this was the best course to adopt.
Conditions at the Gulf Ports.
70. Great inconvenience was caused to British shipping companies by the
chaotic conditions prevailing during the year at the ports of Khorramshahr,
Bandar Shahpur and Bushire. The inefficiency of the Customs and the lack of
landing arrangements equal to coping with the huge cases of machinery and the
girders and other material required for the railway and for the industrialisa
tion of the country had long caused serious congestion in the Customs at the three
ports. This congestion was greatly intensified in the early part of 1937, partly
because goods could not be withdrawn from the Customs for lack of foreign
exchange permits, but mainly owing to the inexperienced management of the
new monopoly companies, which ordered their requirements for an entire year
to arrive all at once instead of spread over the year. The confusion was
particularly bad at Khorramshahr, where incoming cargo was piled in every
available space all over the town. One especially serious consequence of the
congestion was an intensification of the rise in transport costs throughout the
country because urgently-needed lorries, tyres and accessories could not be cleared
from the Customs. For lack of storage space, cargo could not be unloaded from
lighters, and one consignment of motor cars remained so long on a barge that
it eventually sank. Lack of barges caused serious delays to steamers, and much
cargo was overcarried to Basra. His Majesty s Legation were instructed by the
Foreign Office to consider whether representations regarding the conditions at
the various ports could usefully be made to the Iranian Government. But, since
the Iranian Government were the chief sufferers from the congestion and were
greatly embarrassed by it and doing what they could to remedy it, it was decided
that nothing would be gained by such representations. As so often, the Anglo-
Iranian Oil Company came to the assistance of the local authorities in Khuzistan,
lending a crane and storage space in their compound at Khorramshahr, and
unloading and assembling a considerable number of motor lorries at Abadan.
71. The lack of barges at Khorramshahr available for working steamers
made it necessary for the British steamship agents, who had for many years held
the greater part of the business of landing cargo at that port, to hire barges fiom
Basra at considerable cost. Landing charges thus rose steeply. The situation
thus created, by enabling him to represent that the foreign agents’ charges were
excessive, gave Colonel Bayendor an opportunity to carry through a scheme, which
he had been hatching for some time, for the formation of an Iranian company
with the monopoly of landing cargo at Khorramshahr. The company, the
Sherkat-i-Kashtirani Karun, was formed in February, being mainly controlled
by a rich Khorramshahr merchant named Novaghar. On the 30th March Colonel
Bayendor issued an order stating that the company had the sole right of
[16966] D * 2

About this item

Content

Annual reports for Persia [Iran] produced by staff at the British Legation in Tehran. The reports were sent to the Foreign Office by HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. at Tehran (from 1943, Ambassador to Iran). The reports cover the following years: 1932 (ff 2-50); 1933 (ff 51-98); 1934 (ff 99-128); 1935 (ff 129-165); 1936 (ff 166-195); 1937 (ff 196-227); 1938 (ff 228-249); 1939 (ff 250-251); 1940 (ff 252-257); 1941 (ff 258-266); 1942 (ff 267-277); 1943 (ff 278-289); 1944 (ff 290-306); 1945 (ff 307-317); 1946 (ff 318-320).

The reports for 1932 to 1938 are comprehensive in nature (each containing their own table of contents), and cover: an introductory statement on affairs in Persia, with a focus on the Shah’s programme of modernisation across the country; an overview of foreign relations between Persia and other nations, including with the United Kingdom, British India, and Iraq; Persia’s involvement in international conventions and agreements, for example the League of Nations and the Slave Traffic Convention; British interests in or associated with Persia, including Bahrain and Bahrainis resident in Persia, the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. at Bushire, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Imperial Bank of Persia, and the Imperial and International Communications Company; political affairs in Persia, including court and officials, majlis, tribes and security; economic affairs in Persia (government finances and budgets, trade, industry, agriculture, opium production); communications (aviation, railways, roads); consular matters; military matters (army, navy, air force).

Reports from 1939 to 1946 are briefer in nature, Reports from 1941 onwards focusing on the Anglo-Soviet occupation of Persia, and the role of United States advisors in the Persian Government’s administration.

The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 file (320 folios)
Arrangement

The file’s reports are arranged in chronological order from the front to the rear of the file. Each report for the years 1932-1938 begins with a table of contents referring to that report’s own printed pagination sequence.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 321; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The file contains one foliation anomaly, f 308A

Pagination: Each of the reports included in the file has its own printed pagination system, commencing at 1 on the first page of the report.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎205r] (409/644), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3472A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x00000a> [accessed 6 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x00000a">Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [&lrm;205r] (409/644)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x00000a">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0409.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image