'Koweit: A Report' [‎45v] (99/140)

IO
Mubarak installed Abdul Aziz bin Feysul as Amir of Nejdi
to which the latter has some hereditary right, being descended
from the Wahabi chiefs who ruled over Central Arabia, with Nejd
as their head-quarters, until they were ousted by the uncle of the
present Ibn Rashid.
Mubarak, it seems, while on the march back to Koweit, his
troops short of ammunition after some months of campaigning in
the interior, w T as ambuscaded not far from Hayil and his force
was undoubtedly somewhat severely handled. The accounts of
this reverse, however, appear to have been much exaggerated.
Mubarak himself arrived back at Koweit on March 31st, 1901.
1 he defeat was partly due to treachery; a tribe which formed
part of his force, going over to Ibn Rashid’s side, during the
fight.
J he young Wahabi, newdy installed Amir, hearing of this
reverse fortified himself in his new capital, while Sheikh Sadun,
chief of the Muntafik tribe, raided in rapid succession several
large caravans of Ibn Rashid s on the main routes between Hayil
and the Euphrates, in retaliation for the repulse of his friend
and ally, Mubarak.
During the remainder of the year, 190 1 , the following events
took place, which owing to their recent date, and varied char
acter, may perhaps be more properly considered as political,
rathei than historical, and as such must form the subject matter
for a separate chapter.
POLITICAL.
In August 1901, a Turkish gunboat arrived in Koweit Bay •
it does not appear very clearly with what precise object but
her movements appeared suspicious, and it seemed evident that
some action (it may have been merely the landing of stores with
perhaps a few men as guards) was contemplated by the Turkish
authorities which might have been referred to later, as constitut
ing protection and as being inconsistent with Mubarak’s claim
of independence.
i , bntlsh Oovernme nt does not admit the claim c
the lurks to sovereignty over Koweit. Mubarak assert
f 1 V 1 m K . oweit J T a . s ever shown fealty* in anyway, t
the Sultan of Turkey. His dealings with Great Britain haw
been direct, and those of an independent ruler. Ac
cordingly, the commander of H.M.S. Perseus informe,
the commander of the Turkish ship that he could not b.
* Palgrave distinctly says that the Sheikh of Koweit at th* i,
writing (1863), had refused the demands of tribute and submission, mTde byT
Turkish authonhes of Basrah and Baghdad “Thus escaping^ decline an
dissolution almost inevitable for all seaports under Ottoman adnfinistration.”
pe
im
foi
an
wa
dej
Ibi
str
Ra
tov
out
on
Ko
Mr
Ko
of
put
tha
by
his
the
wit
bee
at
of 1
pea
tele
on
mei
ren
ord
his
to r
Offi
thai
pen
und
Offi
the
The
or r
rece
stre
refu