‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [172r] (342/949)
The record is made up of 1 file (475 folios). It was created in 7 Nov 1901-23 Aug 1905. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
or 10 crores. I look upon it that this expenditure would never be agreed to for this abso
lutely unremunerative line at all events under present conditions.
My view then in regard to Rittich’s project is—
(1) To obtain concession for road and railway from Bunder Abbas to Regan as soon as
Russia moves.
t
(2) Should Russia commence a line from Tehran towards Yezd,to reply by commenc
ing the line Bunder Abbas-Regan (about 250 miles) by a road on railway gradi
ents.
(3) But in the meantimeendeavour by every means to make the line Chaman-Kandahar-
Khwaja Ali or Nushki-Khwaja Ali.
(4<) If Russia advance their line from Meshed to Seistan, reply by (3).
(5) For the present maintain a small force at Robat with support north of Chagai. We
have now the upper hand and should keep it.
In regard to ( 2 ), I would follow Russia’s lead and show that we were prepared to push a
line to Regan to prevent her doing so. It may be considered that India would be so threatened
by an advance of Russia to the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
as to warrant expenditure from Indian revenues.
The distance is about 250 miles and the cost would be probably 3 crores.
But I would support Seistan from Kandahar and make the line of communication through
that place.
The main point to keep in view is that with Afghanistan obstructive our strategical scheme
practically falls to the ground.
The question how far Russia’s action in Persia should he considered a “ casus belli ” is one
of Imperial policy, but in my opinion any infringement of our sphere of influence in southern
Persia or aggressive action towards Seistan should be considered so. If war is inevitable, it is
better to have it before Russian schemes for advance are completed than when they have been
carried out. I agree with the Commander-in-Chief that the occupation of Seistan would
necessitate an increase to our Army chiefly by utilising Baluchis.
I cannot help thinking that we are safe from Captain Rittich’s scheme for some time to
come for with the effects of the present war to face, Russia is hardly likely to find 20 million
sterling for the central Persian line for strategical purposes in the near future.
24,.4,-04. E. R. E[lles].
His Excellency the Viceroy.
As your Excellency did not wish to mention the case in Council on 25th I took back
the file from Private Secretary to Viceroy and now resubmit it with a note by the Military
Member that I have just received.
The final decision about an outpost at Robat and a supporting post somewhere north of
Chagai was that the matter should be carefully considered, as, if and when Colonel McMahon
withdrew from Seistan, it might be advisable to adopt this action. The route from Nushki
to Barabchah, which appears to be the most suitable place for a supporting post as it is situated
at an altitude of about 5,600 feet and possess a good supply of water and fodder, will I hope
shortly be further investigated. It also commands the best and shortest approaches to the
Helmand.
If your Excellency so desires copies of the notes will be printed up and a selection of
the papers sent home for your use.
27-4-04. L- W. Dane.
I have now read all the notes, but do not consider it necessary to write further at the
present stage. Please have the file printed up and send me half a dozen copies by next mail to
London.
28-4-04.
C[okzon].
About this item
- Content
This part contains papers mostly relating to British interests in Persia [Iran] and the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .
It includes a copy of the Board of Trade Commercial Intelligence Committee ‘Report received from Mr. H. W. Maclean, the Special Commissioner appointed by the Commercial Intelligence Committee of the Board of Trade, on the conditions and prospects of British trade in Persia.’
A handwritten note at the front of the file, on folio 5, states ‘Spare copy of notes & correspondence of the “Helmand Control” file (with maps)’. Folio 110 consists of handwritten notes, including one dated 27 April 1904, which states ‘The secret Helmand papers have been printed up, and a set, with necessary maps, is submitted for H.E. the Viceroy to take to England.’ Much of the file concerns the question of controlling the water of the Helmand river and irrigating its whole delta, and the work of the Seistan Arbitration Commission to arbitrate between Persia and Afghanistan on the question of rights to the water of the Helmand in Seistan.
The file also includes reports by W A Johns on reconnaissances of potential railway routes made while he was attached to the Seistan Arbitration Commission, and other papers relating to railways and roads in Persia.
In addition, the file includes copies of the following Government of India Foreign Department Proceedings, which reproduce received Foreign Department correspondence on the following subjects: ‘Selection of a British naval base in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .’, November 1901, Nos. 74-83; ‘Visit of His Excellency the Viceroy to the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. during November-December 1903.’, February 1904, Nos. 33-127; ‘Establishment of telegraphic communication with Henjam. Question of the selection of a naval base in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Aggressive action of the Persians at Tamb and Abu Musa; their claim to the Islands.’, June 1904, Nos. 300-388; ‘Reports of the Commercial Mission to Persia.’, June 1905, Nos. 45-111; ‘Question of retaining flagstaffs erected in the neighbourhood of the Musandim Promontory’, August 1905, Nos. 288-307.’
The file also includes: brief handwritten notes written by Curzon on headed paper belonging to the Viceregal Lodge, Simla, relating to Seistan and to Lord Kitchener’s planned reforms for the reorganisation and redistribution of the Indian Army; and a printed copy of the report ‘A Note by Major H.L. [Herbert Lionel] Showers, C.I.E., on the present state of affairs in Kelat and a review of the system of Administration now being pursued.’
The file includes four maps: ‘Map of the Tail waters of Helmand River’ (13 July 1903), f 122; ‘Plan Shewing Proposed Routes for a Railway from Nushki to Afghan Frontier near Robat’ (10 April 1903), f 139; ‘Extract from Admiralty Chart No. 753. (Entrance to the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ).’ (October 1901), f 219; and ‘Sketch of route Ram Hormuz to Fellahieh.’ (April 1904), f 230.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (475 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in no apparent order, apart from the Government of India Foreign Department Proceedings, folios 231 to 474, which are arranged in chronological order.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [172r] (342/949), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F111/359/1, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x00008f> [accessed 27 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x00008f
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x00008f">‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎172r] (342/949)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x00008f"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/Mss Eur F111_359_0349.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F111/359/1
- Title
- ‘Persia – especially Seistan’
- Pages
- front, 2r:194v, 195v:196r, 197v:199v, 200v, 201v, 203r:272r, 273v:275v, 277r:405v, 408r:408v, 409v, 411r:413v, 414v:419v, 420v:424v, 425v:432v, 433v:435v, 436v, 437v:443v, 444v:471v, 473r:475v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎172r] (342/949) ‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎172r] (342/949)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/Mss Eur F111_359_0349.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)