Skip to item: of 1,061
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎469r] (936/949)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (475 folios). It was created in 7 Nov 1901-23 Aug 1905. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

5. Gwadur incontestably pertains to Maskat and need not be referred to
again.
6. The Foreign Office can hardly desire any remarks from me regarding
the French claim on behalf of the Sultan to the whole territory of the Trucial
Chiefs and to the portions of Persia mentioned above. The means of combat
ing it are historical, not geographical. Geographically the claim is an
absurdity.
7. The question is thus narrowed down to one of the continuity of the
Sultan s possessions between the boundary
of Sharga—which I concur with Major
Cox* in placing between the villages of
* See his letter No 291 of 2n;l July 1902, para
graph 12 (Pros. Secret E„ November 1902, Nos. 7-2l).
Sba’am (Shuam) and libat (Tibba)—and the westernmost point in the Sultan’s
province of Dhofar—which is a village called Rakhyut. Three sections of
f T)ib» in this note means only Dibi proper, that
is, Hisn Diba or Southern Diba. The place some
times callei Northern Diba has a distinctive name,
Bai’a, as well. Kalba or Jhalla must not be con
founded with Khor Kalba.
[but not including) Diba, which
} Government of India’s despatch to Secretary
of State, No. 192, Secret E. of 23rd October 1902.
this long stretch of coast arc in controversy, or liable to become so. They are
Sur t a tentative claim to independence on behalf of which is now being advanced
by the French ; the littoral from Diba^
to . Khor Kalba inclusive, the title to
which of the Sharga Shaikh has been re
cognised by the British Government; and
the coast from [and including) Tib at to
the Government of India was at one time
inclined to treat as independent territory
belonging to the Shihhiyin.J I will take
these sections in order.
8. The case for the independence of Sur is a weak one, unless we ourselves
strengthen it by creating an unfortunate analogy. The French admit there
is a AVali at Sur and my inquiries show that the Sultan maintains two forts
and four smaller posts there, namely, Ilisn As Saiyid (60 men), Sanaisala
(30 men), ’Is (10 men), Jinah (5 men), Sakaikara (10 men) and Shamih
(10 men). Major Grey has promised me an estimate of the Saltan’s revenues,
which will no doubt show what he derives from Sur; meanwhile I am able to
state that in 1895 and 1896 the Sultan collected a special export tax at Sur
which yielded 8650 : this was an undeni-
other instance,, both old and recent. able act of sovereignty.§ The French
assertion that “the tribes of Sur have
never ceased to proclaim their independence of the ruler of Oman ” is unintel
ligible to us unless it refers to certan tribes of the inland Sharkiya province,
whose port is Sur and who have been in a chronic state of rebellion for years.
But how can the behaviour of these inaccessible tribes affect the political
status of Sur ? There have, it is true, been partial rebellions and a good deal
of insubordination, at Sur in recent years.
9. The claim of the Shaikh of Sharga to the strip between Diba and Khor
Kalba was fully considered before being admitted by us. Less than a month
ao-o, in a crowded assembly at Sohar which included the Suttans acting Mali
of that place, I asked which villages belonged to Siiarga. The reply was given,
without a dissenting voice, that all the coast villages from Khor Kalba to Diba,
inclusive, were under Sliarga.|] lliere
P There i 9 no need to notjee the depute between Q reas0n to recede from OUr deci-
Sharga and Fuiaira. Fujmra at the most is a . ' . . . « , r . c ,,-, Qr ,i n l'| CT
mere enclave An area of land belonging to one country and entirely surrounded by land of just one other country. , SUiirga coming down to tho coast S10U about tlllS Strip Ot COast, especially
ou both north aud south oE it. as we find that in 1886 the Sultan of
Maskat abstained from an attempt to annex .Kalba, Khor Fakkan, and Diba,
the Resident having counselled him against it. The lieneh mig i ascrije is
not pressing his claim to fear of us, but they cannot ge ovei 1C ^
Sharga has held possession for 50 years, and is generally regarded as the
owner,
10. In regard to the coast between Tibat (Tibba) and Diba, exclusive of
the latter, I have several new facts to being forward. L i ll*y
1 a

About this item

Content

This part contains papers mostly relating to British interests in Persia [Iran] and the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .

It includes a copy of the Board of Trade Commercial Intelligence Committee ‘Report received from Mr. H. W. Maclean, the Special Commissioner appointed by the Commercial Intelligence Committee of the Board of Trade, on the conditions and prospects of British trade in Persia.’

A handwritten note at the front of the file, on folio 5, states ‘Spare copy of notes & correspondence of the “Helmand Control” file (with maps)’. Folio 110 consists of handwritten notes, including one dated 27 April 1904, which states ‘The secret Helmand papers have been printed up, and a set, with necessary maps, is submitted for H.E. the Viceroy to take to England.’ Much of the file concerns the question of controlling the water of the Helmand river and irrigating its whole delta, and the work of the Seistan Arbitration Commission to arbitrate between Persia and Afghanistan on the question of rights to the water of the Helmand in Seistan.

The file also includes reports by W A Johns on reconnaissances of potential railway routes made while he was attached to the Seistan Arbitration Commission, and other papers relating to railways and roads in Persia.

In addition, the file includes copies of the following Government of India Foreign Department Proceedings, which reproduce received Foreign Department correspondence on the following subjects: ‘Selection of a British naval base in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .’, November 1901, Nos. 74-83; ‘Visit of His Excellency the Viceroy to the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. during November-December 1903.’, February 1904, Nos. 33-127; ‘Establishment of telegraphic communication with Henjam. Question of the selection of a naval base in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Aggressive action of the Persians at Tamb and Abu Musa; their claim to the Islands.’, June 1904, Nos. 300-388; ‘Reports of the Commercial Mission to Persia.’, June 1905, Nos. 45-111; ‘Question of retaining flagstaffs erected in the neighbourhood of the Musandim Promontory’, August 1905, Nos. 288-307.’

The file also includes: brief handwritten notes written by Curzon on headed paper belonging to the Viceregal Lodge, Simla, relating to Seistan and to Lord Kitchener’s planned reforms for the reorganisation and redistribution of the Indian Army; and a printed copy of the report ‘A Note by Major H.L. [Herbert Lionel] Showers, C.I.E., on the present state of affairs in Kelat and a review of the system of Administration now being pursued.’

The file includes four maps: ‘Map of the Tail waters of Helmand River’ (13 July 1903), f 122; ‘Plan Shewing Proposed Routes for a Railway from Nushki to Afghan Frontier near Robat’ (10 April 1903), f 139; ‘Extract from Admiralty Chart No. 753. (Entrance to the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ).’ (October 1901), f 219; and ‘Sketch of route Ram Hormuz to Fellahieh.’ (April 1904), f 230.

Extent and format
1 file (475 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in no apparent order, apart from the Government of India Foreign Department Proceedings, folios 231 to 474, which are arranged in chronological order.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎469r] (936/949), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F111/359/1, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100093227832.0x000089> [accessed 21 August 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227832.0x000089">‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [&lrm;469r] (936/949)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227832.0x000089">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/Mss Eur F111_359_0949.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image