"ملف (19/191 IV (C 103 مطالبة الفُرس بالبحرين" [و‎‎١‎٥‎٩] (٦٨١/٣٢٠)

15
Turkish protection, could not acknowledge or acquiesce in any such arrangement, India Bd.
seeing that the Government of British India had had relations with Bahrein as
an independent State and had concluded with it certain treaties, namely, one in to
1820 for the suppression of piracy and one in 1847 for the prohibition of the Ssoi^'
exportation of slaves, and that Her Majesty's Government must object to any India Bd
arrangement which would transfer Bahrein to the dominion or protectorship of
any other Power. Lor. i, 885.
62. In the correspondence leading up to this decision Lord Palmerston s cannh.g,
remarked : "I come to the conclusion that it is the opinion of the East India Constanti-
Company that the object first to be aimed at is to prevent Bahrein from falling 12.2.1851°" 40 '
under the control of any foreign Power, and to keep that island in its present
condition of political independence. But I infer from what has been stated in
the despatches which you have communicated to me, that if that independence
could no longer be maintained, and if the ruler and the people of Bahrein were
determined to place themselves under some foreign protection, the East India
Company would think that less evil would arise from affording to Bahrein
British protection than from allowing French, Persian or Turkish authority to
be established in that island."
Attitude of the Wahahis and of Muscat, 1852-53
63. In 1852 the Sheikh proposed to withhold his tribute from the Wahabi Lor
Amir, but on the advice of the Resident decided to pay it. In the same year the
Consul at Zanzibar was instructed to inform the Imam of Muscat that Her
Majesty's Government saw no reason to alter the views regarding the possession
of Bahrein communicated to His Highness in 1849 (paragraph 58 above). In
May 1853 the Government of India authorised the Government of Bombay to
oftei every obstacle to an attack on Bahrein by the Wahabi Amir (who was now Lor
nominally subject to the Turkish Government) on the ground that Her Majesty's
Government would not permit the occupation of Bahrein by the Turkish Govern
ment or by anyone acting for them or in their interest.
Principle of Non-Interference in Internal Affairs laid down by Bombay
Government (1854)
64. On 20th November, 1854, the Government of Bombay in a letter to the
Resident laid down the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of
Bahrein, and authorised the Resident simultaneously to inform the Sheikh of
Qatif on the Arab mainland that the British Government would not tolerate his
further interference with the affairs of Bahrein.
Slavery Agreement with Her Majesty's Government (1856)
65. On lOth May, 1856, an agreement supplementary to the Treaty of 1847
(paragraph 51 above) regarding the slave trade was made with the Sheikh. Its
contents were identical with that of corresponding engagements entered into at
the same time by the Arab rulers of the Trucial Coast.
66. The Sheikh's internal government continued to go from bad to worse.
In September 1858 reparation was secured from him for the ill-treatment of
British subjects in Bahrein. In 1859 a Wahabi attack was averted by British
intervention The local Wahabi Governor sued for pardon to the Senior Naval
Officer; the Wahabi ruler, however, made a formal protest, asserted his authority
over Bahrein, and declared that he was himself a vassal of the Sultan of Turkey
J he Resident, in reply, informed him of the determination of Her Majesty's
Government to preserve the independence of Bahrein, and pointed out the incon
sistency of his piratical attacks on Turkish shipping with his professions of
dependence on the Ottoman Government.
Sheikh's Appeal to Persia and Turkey, 1859-61
67. At the end of 1859 or early in 1860, as the result, apparently, partly T T QQQ
of apprehensions of the Wahabis and partly of irritation at the restraint ' 888 '
™? ed 7 the Resident over his piratical activities directed against the
Wanabis, the Sheikh made a simultaneous appeal for assistance to the Persian t >
Governor of Fars and the Turkish Wali of Bagdad. The Turkish answer was Bomb-, 0
tht-Sheikh arrived Ann M 6 TK 3 P ™/i™an to
iMieiKn, arrivea m April i860. The Persian flag was hoisted, Persian No. 2 Ai
sovereignty proclaimed, and the Sheikh's agreement to pay tribute secured. These v 518 9^q ;
ceiemonies were, however, scarcely over when a Turkish emissary arrived. The 26.7.1860.
. I, 885.
. I, 887.
Aitchison,
Vol. XI.
No. ix, 234.
Lor. I, 887.