مجموعة ٥/١١ "المسار الجوي إلى الهند: طريق الساحل العربي - مهبط الطوارئ في قطر" [ظ‎‎١‎٦‎٩] (٣٤٥/٣٣٨)

4r
in anticipation of a state of affairs which might never arise. Should a more
definite assertion be called for by subsequent developments, that assertion
k ‘ could be made and enforced on the basis of our existing political position
and sea power.” As to the air route, they regarded its establishment along
the Arab littoral, should a decision to this end be reached, as both possible
and advisable without any alteration in “our old and well-tried Gulf policy.”
'They added that the mere presence of an aerodrome would, to some extent^
afford a visible guarantee of British protection, but indicated that some
subsidy to the Sheikhs in whose territories the aerodromes would lie or over
whose territories the air route would pass would probably be necessary.
The reassertion of Persian Authority in the Persian Gulf.
16. It is only in the last two years that Persia has commenced to adopt
an active policy in the Gulf. The result of the adoption of that policy has
been to bring her into conflict on certain points with the Trucial Chiefs and
their interests. The Trucial settlements on the south Persian coast, the
occupation of Henjam for so many years by Trucial Arabs, the Trucial
ownership of the islands of Tamb, Little Tamb, Abu Musa and Sirri, the
title to which of the Sheikhs of Shargah and Uas-al-Khaima is contested by
Persia, have all afforded grounds of friction.
17. The three most important incidents which have arisen are the
expulsion by Persia of the Sheikh of Henjam in May 1928, the arrest in
duly 1928 of a Trucial dhow plying between Dabai and Khassab, which
raised the question of the status of Tamb, and—a direct consequence of the
last-named incident—the questioning by Persia of the independence of the
Trucial owners of Tamb.
* Pol. Kes. to G. of I.,
July 20 1928,
P. 4718.
t Tel. from Pol.
Res. to G. of I.,
June 12 1928,
P. 3077.
18. The history of the expulsion of the Sheikh of Henjam is given in
paras. 28 to 84 of the Memorandum on llenjam on page f||. The incident
was one the disposal of which would, in all probability, have presented
relatively little difficulty, had it been possible to localise ii. But the Sheikh
of Henjam is the father-in-law of the Trucial Sheikh of Dabai; and he and
his people are by race Jowasimi Arabs, who claim never to have accepted
Persian nationality, and who maintain very close relations with their fellow
tribesmen on the north Arabian shore.* As a result, disturbances in
Hen jam react immediately on feeling on the Trucial Coast, and in the
present instance the effect of the expulsion of the Sheikh was, according to
the Senior Naval Officer, so greatly to excite the Trucial Arabs that they
had stated that were it not for “ the British action and our gunboats, they
would come in thousands, seize Kishm Island and Henjam, and kill every
Persian on the islands.”! Representations in the strongest terms were
made to the Residency Agent and the Political Resident, and Sir Lionel
Haworth reported that he had been informed by the brother of the Sheikh
of Dabai, whom he describes as one of the most level-headed and sensible
chiefs on the Trucial Coast, that “if we did nothing to help them, they were
prepared to tear up our treaties, much as they liked them, have done with
our air route and kill all Persian officials they could and massacre all
Persians on the Arab coast.”
+ 1.0. to F.O.,
June 23 1928,
P. 317fi.
Tel. from Viceroy.
1877 S., Sept. 18
1928, P. 5116.
C.O. to 1.0 , Sept. 27
1928, P. 5274.
19. As will be seen from the Memorandum on Henjam, it was agreed,
in the early stages of this incident, that the intervention of His Majesty’s
Government at Tehran on behalf of the Sheikh would do more harm than
good.! The strength of feeling aroused on the Arab littoral, and the danger
emphasised by the Political Resident—that the Trucial Arabs might have
recourse to Ibn Sand should His Majesty’s Government, while failing
themselves to intervene effectively on behalf of the Sheikh, refuse to allow
the Sheikh of Dabai to approach the Persian Government regard in a-him
have since, however, led the Government of India to modify their^view!
Attention has also been drawn by the Colonial Office to the difficulties which
would arise were the Trucial Arabs to become supporters of Ibn Sand and
while for the moment the return of the Sheikh to Henjam at the invitation
of the Persian Government gives hope that a satisfactory solution of the
incident may be found, reconsideration of the decision of IBs Majesty’s
Government not to intervene with Persia may be called for should this