ملف ١٩١٥/٥٣ الجزء IV "الحرب الألمانية: تركيا؛ الخلافة إلخ" [و‎‎٢‎٣‎٥] (٤٨١/٤٦٦)

An
considering this class it is well to remember that in the middle Orient,
secret societies o! political assassins are of ancient date; in 1100 ad. the
devotees of the Old Man of the Mountain made his power felt equally in the
courts of Christendom and Islam.
Having analysed-the main components of Islamic thought in the Near
Last, it is well to point out that there are innumerable links in both the
ancient and modern chains. The classes described are stages in the scale
of mentality and between each one there are a variety of compromises. It
now remains to consider two fundamental bonds of an accidental nature
which affect various sections of the people. The Asiatic Arab Moslems have
a strong bond of union m their language, and a certain moral superiority
owing to their language being that of the Koran. An Arab always will give
precedence to an Arab over another Moslem, and, further, Arabs as a whole
regard themselves as the aristocracy of Islam, since practically all the noble
and sacred houses are of Arab or pseudo-Arab descent. The Ottoman Turks
owing to the prestige of the Ottoman dynasty have the sense of material
superiority, the superiority of physical force ; between the two there is a
silent rivalry and antipathy, though each admits tacitly the other’s claims.
The above fact is mentioned here for it must ever be borne in mind that the
Turkish sense of physical dominion is common to every class of Turk, while
the Arab’s sense of superiority of breed is never absent from the Arab’s mind.
Lastly, it must be remembered that the vast uneducated Moslem masses are
entire strangers to the distinctions which separate these nameless schools of
thought, but are always susceptible to outbursts of fanatical rage, and can
always be relied upon when inspired by official or semi-official promptings
to rise in riot and disorder in the name of religion, providing that the
machinery of retribution is not visible and at hand.
In the problems which His Majesty’s Government is now facing in the
Levant, Egypt, Arabia and Irak, the above factors, racial and spiritual will
doubtless play a cons'durable part, and in deciding on a policy it might be
profitable to examine the way in which the various influences work.
In Egypt we have on the side of the ancients to face the absolute
hostility of Class 1. who seem to have captured the pan-Arab movement, the
benevolent apathy of Class II., and the mild approval of Class III. who
have hardly any influence.
As regards the moderns we have the constitutional opposition of Class I.
which is large, and the unforgiving enmity of Class 11. which is subject to
the influence of tiie Committee of Union and Progress.
On the Western desert side we have the Senussi, a movement which lies
somewhere between Classes 1. and 11. (ancient), but is falling under the
gradually increasing influence of Class 11. (modern). It may here be pointed
out that"as in other political struggles extremes sometimes meet, and the
modern anarchist Moslem is often in alliance with the fanatic of the old school,
the bond of hatred of Christendom being sufficient to blind the adherents of
each cause to the incongruity of the unbending dogmatism of the one with
the aggressive freethiliking of the other.
In Svria it may be assumed that the case is somewhat different Classes
II. I'ancient) and I. (modern) are probably more favourably disposed to us
than in Egypt, and Class II. (modern) is rare owing to the antipathy between
Arabs and Turks and the good influence of the French Jesuit and American
Colleges at Beirut, though it may be noted that the latter institution has
of late lost somewhat in discipline and moral.
The anti-Christian and violent element in Syria will therefore lie chiefly'
with Class I. (ancient), who will be indirectly influenced by the subterranean
intrigues of the \oung lurks at Constantinople.
In Anatolia and Constantinople the Committee, which is Class II.
(modern), is in the complete ascendant and holds all other schools of thought
m absolute servitude, though there is this distinction to be considered, the
violent Class I. (ancient) is almost non-existent, and if the Young Turks
u-e eliminated Class II. and 111. (ancient) would be found to be in great
•ength. I lowever, the slow-moving Turkish intellect and the innate Turkish
c,
zzs
we
sti
S. 290.