"ملف ٥/٢ VI المنطقة المُحايدة في الكويت" [و‎‎١‎٦‎٦] (٧٠٢/٣٣١)

Similarly, in Gregg v. Richards (1926)
1 Ch, ^21, the Court of* "Appeal held that the
delineation of a road in a plan "indorsed on these
presents" did not amount to an unequivocal
expression of "contrary intension" sufficient to
negative the passing of an easement of way on
that road.
It is to be noted that in the cases
already mentioned the words by which the plan and
the parcels clause or other description in the
conveyance or contract have been attached to each
oih^-not been very specific. Nonetheless
everyone of the phrases employed is considerably
stronger than that used in the Agreement made by
the Kuwait Oil Company in 193h# Yet even in those
cases the plan did not prevail over the description.
In another series of cases the plan was
held to be an inseparable part of the description,
though inseparable only because of the formula of
annexation employed. There is no hint of any such
formula or intention in article 1 of the agreement
with tie Shaikh,
The expression of annexation employed
in Lyle v„ Richards (1866) L.R, 1 H.L. 222 was;
"which said premises are particularly described
by the map on the back of this sett." The House
of Lords held that the Judge was bound to look to
the map as forming part of the deed.
In Eastwood v, Ashton'(1915) A.C. 900
decided in the House of'Lords, the land to be'
conveyed was described in the deed as follows,
omitting what is superfluous: "All that farm
called Bank Hay Farm ,., containing 8h acres 3
roods and h perches or thereabouts and in the
occupation as to part thereof of T.H,and
as^to the remainder thereof of C.' rr .C., all of
which said premises are more particularly described
in the plan endorsed on these presents and are de
lineated and coloured red in such plan". It was
held that the description by reference to the plan
ought to prevail and that the disputed strip of
land was included in the conveyance.
The most recent case on the subject,
Wellington v. Townsend (1939) 2 All E.R. 225 is to
tne same effect^ '
Both series of decisions illustrate the
proposition that in the absence of express words
to the contrary the Courts will consider the
description as self-sufficient.