ملف ٣١٢٢\ ١٩٢١ الجزء ١ "بلاد فارس: ترتيبات الحجر الصحي" [و‎‎٢‎٤‎٩] (١١٧٤/٤٩٣)

which contains a British member.
At the International Sanitary Conference in
ip, 2166 / 26 .
fp.O. to 1.0. - ^
jatecl 26.6. Paris, the meeting of which *
26 S 3813/ c UCfj conc tuded m June 1926, the
fe8/34.
* Tehran
Fersian representative endeavoured, unsuccessfully, to
secure recognition of the fact that Persia was not/fully
competent to administer the sanitary services in her ports
without foreign intervention. Having failed to secure his
object, and having refused to consider a compromise under
v-hich article 90 of the Convention (which replaces Article
83 ° f th8 of 1912 > under which the existing
condition of affairs is regulated) should be replaced by an
Article stating that the sanitary regime in Persian ports
woul^ deuermmed oy subsequent negotiations between the
I'ersian Government and His Majesty's Government, he put in a
reservation as regards Article 90. To this our * f
representatives replied by a counter-reservation saving' the
iilS pending tne conclusion of an agreement on the
subject between His Majesty's Government and Persia, and
both reservations were consigped to the record of the
Ppatch 2^ . -■ cy- uno x cuoru oi un©
13th x '' ceedi % s - January of the following year (p. 626/27)
1 ^. we Persian Government raised the question of transfer
^ x0 " SicvI " • e ^ical Officers of'the quarantine service
in 01x6 ' 0Uun w ith the Minister in Teheran?who replied
f/etter 111 the t,0nn sof our reservation of June 1926. In
1927 (P - 3210/f7) th9 ^sistant to the Political
^ iovt Uiiy -issisLani/ "Do tiie
|«Mated ReSldent in the Persian Gulf agrasd, without
auunority, to the exercise by the Persian Government
■ bat was described as "a nominal control" over
quarantine arrangements carried out in the Gulf by
o?r offirp-rc! j. •
-s. ms action was disavowed, the Resident
* 1 % the line, when opportunity offered, that the
t Uebul o n was one w biioh must be raised in Teheran
0Uy ‘ 1119 ordlnar y diplomatic channels, but the
error