‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [182v] (363/949)
The record is made up of 1 file (475 folios). It was created in 7 Nov 1901-23 Aug 1905. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
12
i
From Tehran to Kirman the line passes through settlements and towns
with a purely Persian and extremely peaceful population. If robbery or violence
is possible there it would have a purely accidental character, and the persons to
blame w T ould be nomads such as Kuskar, Arabs, and also Shahsevens as far as
Kum. Moreover, a trustworthy guard in all the large towns, Kum, Kashan,
Nain, Yezd, Anar, and Kirman (50 to 3 00 men in each), will completely
guarantee security on the sections. A proof of this is the cause of contemporary
events in the Yezd Province.
In 1900 , simultaneously with our passage, there was appointed in Yezd a
new Governor, Jellal-ud-din, who was accompanied by fifty trusty mounted men
given him by his father, the celebrated Zil-es-Sultan. The inhabitants greatly
rejoiced at this appointment, as, according to them, his trustworthy cavalry
(ora), to judge from former years of his Governorship, would completely secure
the whole province, and as a consequence the population could be in complete
tranquillity for a year. Of course, their words are somewhat exaggerated, but
in any case the nomad robbers only take that which is ill-guarded, and I am
more than assured that 200 or 300 men would be more than enough for a length
of 300 versts, or a man per verst.
Strategically speaking, the whole of this region Tehran-Kirman, is of
very great importance, and, as will appear from the second part of the Report
it may, even without railways, serve as a field of action for a considerable force,
"Without doubt, if a line should be laid down, it would play a very serious part*
in a collision with England, as the plan of operations on the side of Afghanistan
is very difficult and slow.
Although Kirman lies on the same parallel as Seistan, nevertheless a move
ment from Kirman directly east is very difficult, and the distance is not small.
All caravans from Kirman to Seistan go to Bam, and hence turn off by the
great caravan tract to the north-east to Nusratabad, to which, from the town of
Bam, the distance is 350 versts. Probably, subsequently, with strategic objects,
a branch will be laid down from Bam to Seistan, which'undoubtedly may serve
as a place d'armes for a movement on Candahar and through Nushka to Quetta.
The English have already facilitated our operations in this direction by
constructing a caravan road and digging wells.
Our Vice-Consul Miller, in his July Report’for 1900 , strikes an alarm, and
is much horrified for the safety of our trade, saying that the English, it would
seem, have already prepared all the materials for a railway from Quetta to
Nusratabad.
I doubt the justice of these rumours, but from a military point of view, it
would absolutely play into our hands. In case of war, we shall certainly make
use of that line, and connect with it the town of Bam, if it should be by that
time joined by a continuous railway with Trans-Caucasia.
On the whole, I am of opinion that the Ministry of War should make every
effort to construct the line Allat-Tehran-Bam-Chahbar, as I absolutely do not
understand how the troops of the Caucasian district can operate actively against
India without it. Otherwise the troops will be completely dependent on camels,
and the number of troops sent will not depend on the strength of the enemy but
on the means of transport available. But an Indian war is not like one with
the Turkomans, which even so made itself felt in 1879 . Here the question is
somewhat more serious. Without a railway through Persia we shall drag out
our operations to a great length, and consequently, if we here grudge 100 , 000,090
roubles for a purpose not only military but national, we shall undoubtedly have '
to pay for it in time of war.
Of course, one may avoid the building of a strategic line when there is a
possibility of carrying on operations otherwise, but when without roads, the
carrying on of operations is simply almost impossible or extraordinarily difficult;
in such case there is no room for discussion. In these cases, as in the opening
of a campaign, a complete credit must be opened in the Treasury with the
difference only that, if time permits, the construction may be spread over
several v ears.
About this item
- Content
This part contains papers mostly relating to British interests in Persia [Iran] and the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .
It includes a copy of the Board of Trade Commercial Intelligence Committee ‘Report received from Mr. H. W. Maclean, the Special Commissioner appointed by the Commercial Intelligence Committee of the Board of Trade, on the conditions and prospects of British trade in Persia.’
A handwritten note at the front of the file, on folio 5, states ‘Spare copy of notes & correspondence of the “Helmand Control” file (with maps)’. Folio 110 consists of handwritten notes, including one dated 27 April 1904, which states ‘The secret Helmand papers have been printed up, and a set, with necessary maps, is submitted for H.E. the Viceroy to take to England.’ Much of the file concerns the question of controlling the water of the Helmand river and irrigating its whole delta, and the work of the Seistan Arbitration Commission to arbitrate between Persia and Afghanistan on the question of rights to the water of the Helmand in Seistan.
The file also includes reports by W A Johns on reconnaissances of potential railway routes made while he was attached to the Seistan Arbitration Commission, and other papers relating to railways and roads in Persia.
In addition, the file includes copies of the following Government of India Foreign Department Proceedings, which reproduce received Foreign Department correspondence on the following subjects: ‘Selection of a British naval base in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .’, November 1901, Nos. 74-83; ‘Visit of His Excellency the Viceroy to the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. during November-December 1903.’, February 1904, Nos. 33-127; ‘Establishment of telegraphic communication with Henjam. Question of the selection of a naval base in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Aggressive action of the Persians at Tamb and Abu Musa; their claim to the Islands.’, June 1904, Nos. 300-388; ‘Reports of the Commercial Mission to Persia.’, June 1905, Nos. 45-111; ‘Question of retaining flagstaffs erected in the neighbourhood of the Musandim Promontory’, August 1905, Nos. 288-307.’
The file also includes: brief handwritten notes written by Curzon on headed paper belonging to the Viceregal Lodge, Simla, relating to Seistan and to Lord Kitchener’s planned reforms for the reorganisation and redistribution of the Indian Army; and a printed copy of the report ‘A Note by Major H.L. [Herbert Lionel] Showers, C.I.E., on the present state of affairs in Kelat and a review of the system of Administration now being pursued.’
The file includes four maps: ‘Map of the Tail waters of Helmand River’ (13 July 1903), f 122; ‘Plan Shewing Proposed Routes for a Railway from Nushki to Afghan Frontier near Robat’ (10 April 1903), f 139; ‘Extract from Admiralty Chart No. 753. (Entrance to the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ).’ (October 1901), f 219; and ‘Sketch of route Ram Hormuz to Fellahieh.’ (April 1904), f 230.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (475 folios)
- Arrangement
The papers are arranged in no apparent order, apart from the Government of India Foreign Department Proceedings, folios 231 to 474, which are arranged in chronological order.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [182v] (363/949), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F111/359/1, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x0000a4> [accessed 12 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x0000a4
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x0000a4">‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎182v] (363/949)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100093227829.0x0000a4"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/Mss Eur F111_359_0370.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F111/359/1
- Title
- ‘Persia – especially Seistan’
- Pages
- front, 2r:194v, 195v:196r, 197v:199v, 200v, 201v, 203r:272r, 273v:275v, 277r:405v, 408r:408v, 409v, 411r:413v, 414v:419v, 420v:424v, 425v:432v, 433v:435v, 436v, 437v:443v, 444v:471v, 473r:475v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎182v] (363/949) ‘Persia – especially Seistan’ [‎182v] (363/949)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001452.0x0003c3/Mss Eur F111_359_0370.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)